Daily Stormer
October 2, 2015

In this CNN clip, Trump says, without any apology “the far right does like me.”

The New Observer
October 6, 2015

Leading Republican US presidential hopeful Donald Trump has likely finally ended whatever little support he had among the American “right wing” Jewish lobby with his latest comments about Iraq and Syria, despite his vociferous—and now highly contradictory—pro-Israel stance.

Speaking during last weekend’s This Week, aired on ABC, Trump shocked the Jewish lobby by admitting that the United States has “screwed up the Middle East so badly,” and that by “breaking up Iraq, we have so destabilized the Middle East.”

During a separate interview aired the same day on NBC’s Meet the Press, Trump said that he thought things would be better for the Middle East if Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad were stronger. He also added that he believed the situation in the region would also be much improved if Moamer Kadhafi were still in power in Libya and Saddam Hussein in Iraq—ignoring the fact that both these leaders were only taken out because of their opposition to the Zionist state.

“Of course it would be” better, he told the show, adding: “Libya is not even a country anymore. It’s not even a contest…Iraq is a disaster,” Trump said.

All of these policy positions are directly contradictory to the Jewish neocon’s grand designs to destabilize the entire region. Trump has refused to mention this fact, or even hint at the existence of the Jewish neocon lobby. His reasons for doing so are not hard to fathom: he is a fanatical supporter of Israel, and his daughter converted to Judaism when she married a New York Jew.

Trump’s support for Israel and Jews is a long-established fact. The Jewish Daily Forward, in an article published August 7, 2015, titled “Trump Has Strongest Jewish Ties of all GOP Candidates,” announced that

Among the expansive field of Republican presidential candidates on display in the party’s first debates Thursday night, Donald Trump may be the most closely connected to the Jewish people.

Trump is from New York, works in professions saturated with Jews and long has been a vocal supporter of Israel. His daughter and two grandchildren are Jewish, the executive vice president of his organization is Jewish—and Trump certainly has chutzpah.

The Forward went on to reveal that before the 2013 Israeli election, Trump recorded a video message endorsing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and that he has expressed opposition to incumbent US President Barack Obama’s policy of seeking an end to the argument over Iran’s mythical “atom bombs.”

Finally, the Forward revealed, Trump’s right-hand man is a Jewish lawyer, Michael Cohen, who also serves as a top campaign aide.

Despite this pro-Israeli stance—typical for many US conservatives who do not understand the dynamics behind world politics—Trump has not gained any significant support from America’s traditionally far left-wing organized Jewish community. As a recent article in the Israeli-based Y-Net news service pointed out:

Trump has mostly managed to frighten the Jewish Americans whose votes he covets. US Jews traditionally vote Democrat: In the past two presidential elections roughly 75 percent of them ended up on Barack Obama’s side.

The Y-Net article went on to state that “Jewish stomachs turned” when Trump called Mexican immigrants “drug dealers and rapists” and that this was the primary reason why they would not support him.

Of course, Israel—which the US Jewish community fanatically supports—calls Third World illegal immigrants “invaders,” locks them up, and deports them without trial.

These are the exact same policies that Trump has proposed, but the Jewish lobby, for their own hypocritical reasons, reserves its hatred and venom only for Europeans who want to preserve their identity—and is silent over the Jewish state’s immigration policies.

Trump’s latest comments on Iraq and Syria will therefore most likely have sealed the deal as regards the demise of the last remaining “right wing” Jewish lobby support for his campaign

“Right wing” Jews in America will—ipso facto—be supporters of the neocon’s policy of destabilizing the Middle East in Israel’s favor, and they will (if they have not already), switch to the “safer” Republican  puppet candidates who are completely under their control.

In fact, Trump only remains in the running at all because of his non-reliance on Jewish donors to finance his campaign.

As the Forward newspaper pointed out:

But if you expect to find Jewish donors of influence in Trump’s network of associates, you’ll be disappointed: The billionaire’s campaign is self-financed, not donor-funded. Forbes estimates Trump’s net worth at about $4 billion; Trump says he’s worth $10 billion.

While Y-Net added that

But Trump doesn’t really care. He doesn’t need their donations. The Jewish millionaires of the Republican party observe his success with shocked looks on their faces. He isn’t a part of them, he doesn’t represent them, and his arrival has made them irrelevant.

The Israeli Haaretz newspaper, in an article titled “Donald Trump’s Jewish Fans (Beyond His Daughter Ivanka),” confirmed the fact that Jewish big money was not backing Trump, quoting a source which said that

Most of the money, those with long track records of raising in excess of $100,000, the RJC [Republican Jewish Committee] members, those people are solidly in the Jeb Bush camp.”

* According to a recent opinion poll conducted by SurveyUSA, Trump would beat Hilary Clinton head on if he won the Republican presidential nomination in the 2016 election.

He has been able to achieve this remarkable poll result by being the only candidate in the election to dare to talk about the extent of nonwhite illegal immigration in America—and the fact that that it is overrunning that country and will, if not stopped, soon turn the US into a cross between Mexico and Guatemala.

Trump has also used his unquestioned media-savvy experience and personality to drive home a number of other ancillary truths, particularly about the absurd taxation system in America and the urgent need to halt the outsourcing of all manufacturing industry—and real jobs—to China.

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 6, 2015

Somehow, I missed it when it happened.

But back on September 18, the Jew-Israel paper Haaretz published an article saying that after The Donald is done with the Mexicans, he may well come for the Jews.

The article doesn’t exactly say that The Donald is coming for them. But that is the clear suggestion.

Anne Coulter’s infamous tweet against the Jews is referenced, and the Jewish argument (which I actually agree with) that once you allow for Whites to have a collective identity, they will eventually come for the Jews, is put forward is so many (too many, in fact) words.

That is why Trump is so important to me, and why the Jews hate him so much: it isn’t because he is actually going to directly oppose the Jews, or round them up or something. It is that he is creating a climate wherein that will be the obvious next step.

Everything the Jews do is connected to their survival strategy, which is based in existing as a parasitic outsider group, feeding off the majority population, while keeping from being expelled.

The destruction of the family, the destruction of a collective identity, the mass importing of non-Whites and then the agitation of them – this is all part of the parasite strategy that is hardwired into their genes. The reason they so obsessively crave power is to push this agenda. You can see it everywhere.

The Donald, while not opposing them directly, is indeed opposing every element of their core biological survival strategy.

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 7, 2015

A prominent Jew billionaire, Barry Diller, has declared that he will flee America if Donald Trump becomes our Great Leader.

Bloomberg:

“All he is is a huckster,” Diller said of Donald Trump. “Somebody who learned long ago in real estate that if you can make a big name for yourself, it can get you an extra dollar.” In addition to questioning the Republican front-runner’s motivation for running, Diller attacked Trump for appealing to the nation’s worser angels. “He’s a self-promoting huckster who found a vein,” Diller continued. “A vein of meanness and nastiness.”

Speaking with Erik Schatzker at the Bloomberg Markets Most Influential Summit, Diller vowed to pick up stakes if Trump becomes President Barack Obama’s successor. “If Donald Trump doesn’t fall, I’ll either move out of the country or join the resistance,” he said. But Diller expressed his certainty that a Trump presidency will never happen. He said he’d put his money on it.

So if Trump gets elected, America will have one less Jew media billionaire, for sure. Even if he is lying about deporting all these brown people, this alone is enough reason to get registered and vote in the GOP primary for the Donald.

For those who don’t know who Diller is, he is no average Jew – he is a super-Jew.

Wikipedia:

Barry Charles Diller (born February 2, 1942) is an American businessman, who currently serves as the Chairman and Senior Executive of IAC/InterActiveCorp and Expedia, Inc. and the media executive responsible for the creation of Fox Broadcasting Company and USA Broadcasting. Diller is a member of the Television Hall of Fame, having been inducted in 1994.

…

Diller was born and raised in a Jewish household in San Francisco, California, and is the son of Reva (Addison) and Michael Diller.

…

Diller is responsible for what the media dubs “The Killer Dillers” – people whom Diller mentored and who later became big-time media executives in their own right. Examples include Michael Eisner (who was President & COO of Paramount Pictures while Diller was Chairman & CEO of Paramount Pictures, who went on to become Chairman & CEO of The Walt Disney Company), Dawn Steel (future head of Columbia Pictures and one of the first women to run a major movie studio, who worked under Diller at Paramount), Jeffrey Katzenberg (head of PDI/DreamWorks Animation, principal of DreamWorks SKG, former head of Walt Disney Studios, and a head of production of Paramount under Diller), Garth Ancier, President of BBC America, and Don Simpson, who was President of Production at Paramount under Diller and Eisner and later went on to run a production company based on the Disney lot with Jerry Bruckheimer.

He is married to a Jewess, Diane von Fürstenberg, who was formerly married to German Prince Egon von Fürstenberg.

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 9, 2015

The Donald has once again proven that he is evil and that “make America great again” is codeword for “race war.”

TPM:

Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump late Wednesday thanked and retweeted a message of support from a man who identified himself as a Dutch white supremacist.

Twitter user @keksec_org tweeted at the real estate mogul to tell him “I truly believe you are the best to #MakeAmericaGreatAgain.”

…

It’s unclear exactly who is behind @keksec_org, whose tweets lie in an ambiguous grey area between trolling and flat-out racism.

Yeah, we’ve all gotten pretty good at that.

For instance, I could say tomorrow that I’ve been running this site for three years as a joke, and no one would really know if that was true or not.

But what if I told you it is both trolling and flat-out racism, and the joke is on you kikes for not being capable of grasping this level of complexity?

What if I told you there was literally no difference whatsoever between those two things, and anyone who ever thought there was was being trolled?

What if I told you the whole “well I can’t tell if he’s joking or not” thing is the most brilliant response to Jewish psychological warfare ever developed?

What if I told you it was in fact the only possible response and was actually invented accidentally by a bunch of teenagers who thought it was funny to piss people off on the internet and then suddenly realized that the reason something is offensive is usually that it’s true?

A personal website listed in the user’s bio leads to a page promising “the dankest memes online.” After securing the first Trump retweet, the user tweeted again at the billionaire: “I wish you were my dad, so we can #MakeAmericaGreatAgain.”

But @keksec_org retweets missives from Geert Wilders, an anti-Muslim Dutch politician, as often as tweets about Trump. The user also frequently laments white genocide and defends slavery and colonialism on Twitter. @keksec_org dismisses black critics by calling them “melanin enhanced” or referring to the “feeble mind of the African American negro.”

And you haven’t figured out what’s happening here yet.

The Jews have also failed to figure out what is happening with The Donald’s refusal to condemn we trolls and/or actual Jew-hating racists.

Jewish Daily Forward:

“On social media, it seems that while not all Donald Trump supporters are anti-Semites, many of the vocal and vicious anti-Semites seem to be Donald Trump supporters.”

That’s what Rick Wilson, a Republican strategist and writer often accused of climbing into the pockets of “The Jews,” told me recently.

The widespread anti-Semitism of Trump’s fans hit the news after the September 16 Republican debate, thanks to one of his biggest supporters, Ann Coulter, who tweeted, “How many f—king Jews do these people think there are in the United States?” when several candidates affirmed support for Israel during their closing remarks. Coulter’s comments, coupled with the anti-Semitism on display from her supporters — who immediately started the Twitter hashtag #IStandWithAnn — are becoming typical of Trump’s fan base.

What is most shocking on the heels of the general anti-Semitism of Trump’s fans and now with the mainstream exposure of them due to Coulter’s comments is the candidate’s radio silence on the situation. Trump is known for many things, but keeping his lips sealed is certainly not one of them. Since his campaign has taken off, Trump has spent a good deal of energy playing dumb when it comes to the overwhelming nature of the support for his candidacy from white nationalists and neo-Nazis. Worse than Trump’s willful blindness is the rhetoric he uses to stoke racial unrest with a slogan — “Make America Great Again” — reminiscent of the Nazi Party of the 1930s.

Yes, maybe The Donald is the new Hitler.

Or… maybe he is just trolling you?

He could actually become President and start rounding up Jews and putting them in camps and then years later come out and be like “look, it was a joke, the whole time I was only in it for the keks, lol.”

What would you say then, Jews?

William Martel
Daily Stormer
October 15, 2015

This happened.

The Donald certainly has an edgy, unapologetic personality which is quite entertaining to witness in action as he demolishes his opponents and doesn’t back down to criticism (as the rest of our feminized PC politicians do).

But this is another whole level of shit-lording.

His retweet contains a video that a Trump fan made called “You Can’t Stump the Trump,” which is composed of various clips showing people trying to stump the Trump but getting totally shut down every time; accompanied by visuals and sound effects to further mock these people.

This is the kind of attitude an alpha-male needs to have when handling weaklings who have been giving a stage in this upside-down world.

Enjoy.

Patrick J. Buchanan
October 16, 2015

Barack Obama sought as his legacy to bring an end to the two longest wars in U.S. history. On Oct. 15, he, again, admitted failure.

The 9,800 U.S. troops in Afghanistan will remain another year. And, on Inauguration Day 2017, 5,500 U.S. troops will still be there.

Why cannot we leave? Because, if we do, we risk the re-seizure of power by the Taliban we drove out 14 years ago, and a wipeout of all we have accomplished in America’s longest war.

When can we come home? Never, if we hope to secure that for which we have already paid with 2,500 U.S. dead.

For not only have the Taliban shown they can capture cities like Kunduz in the north, ISIS has arrived to begin its trademark atrocities. One can only imagine what will happen to the men, women and girls we liberated when we leave, and Kabul falls. Think Saigon, 1975.

In reluctantly deciding not to depart, Obama seems to have learned the lesson of Iraq. There, we have gone back in with 3,000 U.S. troops, after the president had pulled out the last 10,000.

And what is the balance sheet now on Operation Iraqi Freedom, the bloodiest and most costly American war since Vietnam?

The Islamic State controls Mosul, Ramadi and the huge Sunni province of Anbar. Baghdad relies on U.S. air power against ISIS, but looks to Tehran for guidance. The Shiite militias indispensable to the regime’s survival are, most of them, pro-ayatollah and anti-American.

Unloved and unappreciated, the American Empire soldiers on.

Understandably, President Obama does not want a collapse on his watch in Baghdad or Kabul, though he opposed the Iraq war and was never an enthusiast of nation-building in the Hindu Kush.

The liberal interventionists and neocons who goaded George W. Bush on got us into these wars. But they had no clue as to what would happen once we got in, and they have no idea today on how we can get out. Indeed, they have no desire to get out.

Rather, they want us to repudiate the nuclear deal that the five permanent members of the Security Council and Germany negotiated with Iran, and impose new sanctions. And if Iran refuses to renegotiate and yield, they would happily exercise “all options on the table.”

They would not rule out yet another American war, on Iran, which has a larger population than Afghanistan and Iraq put together, and is far better prepared and equipped to defend itself.

They want the United States to sustain the “good” rebels in Syria and to insist that “Assad must go.” Asked who rises if Assad falls, if not ISIS, they dismiss the question.

But if ISIS is the enemy with whom we cannot deal, why do we not partner with Putin, the Iranians, the Syrian army of Bashar Assad and the Kurds to all pile on and annihilate ISIS in Syria and Iraq?

John Kerry’s repetitive reply — “Assad must go!”

Vladimir Putin’s retort — the Americans have “mush for brains.”

Looking at what we sought to do with our interventions in Libya, Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Afghanistan, has any of them turned out as the war hawks predicted, or we had hoped? Do the prospects of any of these failed states look better for our intervention?

Yet the Beltway hawks now want to confront Russia in Syria and Ukraine, and are looking forward to challenging China’s claims to islets in the Spratly chain by sailing U.S. warships inside the 12-mile limit.

Republican presidential candidates like Lindsey Graham are even talking up sending U.S. ground forces back into Iraq and into Syria.

What we could accomplish there, and when we could get out, are questions that are not only unanswered, they are unasked.

In analyzing the presidential race, the one conclusion upon which all agree is that the anti-Washington, anti-incumbent sentiment is far deeper and wider than most had imagined.

The surge in the polls of Bernie Sanders at the expense of Hillary Clinton, and of Donald Trump at the expense of the GOP establishment, are the political stories of the year.

And what do Socialist Sanders and Capitalist Trump have in common? Neither is an interventionist — both opposed the Iraq War.

Trump, unlike Carly Fiorina, would talk to Vladimir Putin. Unlike the departed Scott Walter, he would not tear up the Iran nuclear deal the day he took office. He would monitor and enforce it.

Unlike other Republican candidates, he does not look upon Putin’s intervention on behalf of Assad with anger and outrage. If Putin wants to bomb ISIS, be my guest, says Trump.

Trump has not laid out a broad foreign policy. Yet, the sense one gets is that, like Eisenhower, Nixon and Reagan, he is a “peace through strength” Republican who looks to extricate us from Mideast wars now underway, and not be looking to start any new ones.

For anti-interventionists, Trump vs. Sanders is the ideal race.

Photos and captions added by The Daily Stormer.

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 16, 2015

Sanders could easily have called Hillary out as a criminal. Yet he did not. I wonder why.

The Donald also wonders.

USA Today:

Donald Trump continued his analysis of Tuesday’s night’s debate, which he live-tweeted, during a rally in Richmond, Va. on Wednesday.

The Republican front-runner’s biggest criticism was that he felt no one went after Hillary Clinton aggressively enough. “Nobody attacked her,” he said. “There was no attack.”

The moderators and other Democratic candidates stuck to policy questions, Trump said. In contrast, he felt the Republican debates were “like a reality-television show. With me, everything was an attack.”

Trump was appalled at the extent to which he felt Clinton moved to the left to compete with Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, whom he calls a communist/socialist and a “maniac.”

“I watched last night as Hillary and Bernie Sanders, they just couldn’t give away things fast enough,” Trump said, presumably referring to their promises of spending on programs such as higher education and paid family leave. “And they’re giving them to illegal immigrants. They want heath care for illegal immigrants. They want drivers licenses for illegal immigrants. They want, listen to this, social security for illegal immigrants.”

Hillary is such an easy target, and the fact that Sanders (and I guess there were other guys) didn’t bother to attack her shows that this kike vs. dyke contest is a total hoax.

Interesting that Biden didn’t show up. I had figured there was a good chance he would have. I am relatively sure Hillary is out. But we’ll see.

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 18, 2015

The Trump train has no brakes. Yesterday, we had The Donald shutting down Jeb, pointing out that his brother allowed our tallest buildings to get blown up.

Today, the Donald is calling out the Jew agents accusing Russia – without any proof – of downing MH17.

Sputnik:

Donald Trump, a leading Republican nominee for the 2016 presidential election, called on Americans to focus on making the US “great again,” rather than accusing Russia — or anybody else, for that matter, without proof – of taking down the Malaysian airliner over the Donetsk region in the summer of 2014.

Trump, who has often spoken out in support of Russia and its president Vladimir Putin, said during an interview with US cable news network MSNBC that despite the recent Dutch report that concluded Malaysia Airlines flight 17 was brought down by a Russian-made missile, it doesn’t mean the Russians fired the rocket.

“It may have been their weapon, but they didn’t use it, they didn’t fire it, they even said the other side fired it to blame them,” he said. “I mean to be honest with you, you’ll probably never know for sure.”

Yeah, though we won’t ever know for sure, the most likely option is that the Ukraine Jews shot it down in order to blame Russia for it. It is almost impossible that it could have been an accident (though it is technically possible), and neither side had a motive for shooting it down except the Ukraine for the purpose of blaming Russia.

The Donald is clued-up on everything.

The real estate mogul and presidential hopeful didn’t express too much hope that the case would ever be solved.

“I think it is horrible,” Trump said. “But they’re saying it wasn’t them. The other side says it is them. And we’re going to go through that arguing for probably for 50 years and nobody is ever going to know.”

Moreover, Trump stressed that there are enough domestic problems in the US that need to be solved to “make America great again” (to cite The Donald’s campaign slogan,) that meddling in conflicts abroad is a dangerous distraction.

The Russians have already released a report claiming it was an Israeli-made air-to-air missile that took the plane down, not a Russian-made surface-to-air missile.

RT:

A report on Malaysian Airlines MH17 air disaster in Ukraine last year by a group of old-hand aviation security experts maintains that the Boeing might have been downed by an Israeli Python air-to-air missile.

The report was leaked via the private LiveJournal account of Albert Naryshkin (aka albert_lex) late on Tuesday and has already been widely discussed by social media communities in Russia.

The authors of the investigative report have calculated the possible detonation initiation point of the missile that hit the passenger aircraft and approximate number and weight of strike elements, which in turn designated the type and presumed manufacturer of the weapon.

…

The external view of MH17 hull pieces indicates that “fragments of the pilots’ cockpit have suffered specific damages in the form of localized puncture holes and surface dents typical for hypervelocity impacts with compact and hard objects,” the report says, stressing that similar damage could be found on the inner side of the cockpit.

The report specifically points out that chips of the body coat around the holes in the fragment are typical of wave effects created by hypervelocity impacts.

Some damage, though larger and less clustered, could be found near the air-scoop of the left-wing engine of the aircraft.

The nature of the damage allows for the identification of the source as a high-explosive fragmentation warhead from a modern anti-aircraft weapon, claims the report.

Apart from the large puncture holes, the debris of the nose and the cockpit of the aircraft bear a large number of scattered micro-craters resulting from the impact of high-velocity dust and tiny debris, such as an unburnt blasting agent and elements of the ordnance that accompany a shock wave from a blast that occurred very close to the target. In the case of MH17, the pilots’ cockpit.

The report says that as a rule, the initial speed of the striking elements of modern anti-aircraft weapons vary between 1,500 and 2,500 meters per second.

I’m not a ballistics expert, so I’ve got no idea; this will be the case for most people (only a very small portion of the general public are ballistics experts). So it really just comes down to common sense – is it very likely Putin ordered a passenger jet from Netherlands shot down just because he is a mean person?

This explanation of “oh yes our enemy did or is planning to do this atrocity that makes no sense because he is evil and insane” isn’t even working on the Arabs anymore as we saw with the backlash about the Jew/Obama plan to invade Syria on the claim that Assad was gassing his own people for no reason and we have a moral obligation to do a Libya on him.

Trying it on Putin – a White man, who comes across very well to Western audiences even while speaking a foreign language – is ridiculous.

Once more The Donald has successfully managed to allude to a serious issue in America with just a few simple words.

It sure does feel good to finally be winning.

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 18, 2015

George W. Bush is one of the worst examples of personal human failure in the recorded history of Earth. Unless of course his purpose was to drive America into the ground, then he was an extremely successful individual.

Either way, people hate him. And Jeb Bush associating with him, and claiming that massive towers exploding and killing thousands is “safe” is not at all good for his campaign.

Most people reading this here presumably view 911 as a Jewish attack on America. Either because they organized it themselves, or fed intelligence and resources to existing jihadis and ensured the operation went through. Regardless of how you view the event, however, it happened on George Bush’s watch. That is not controversial. George Bush was definitely President when these towers came down.

What’s more, it is a matter of record that Bush and his administration were repeatedly warned of an impending terrorist attack on America, often given the exact date of 9/11 by intelligence sources. The people who committed the attack were known to the NSA, FBI and CIA.

So by pressing this issue, it appears as though Jeb Cuck is trying to fail on purpose.

Washington Post:

If he had been president, Donald Trump said Sunday, his immigration policies would have prevented the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. He also said fellow GOP presidential candidate Jeb Bush should stop defending his brother over the Sept. 11 attacks, as the two rivals took their feud to the airwaves on Sunday.

“I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I’m extremely tough on people coming into this country. I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those people would have been in the country,” Trump said on “Fox News Sunday.”

“With that being said, I’m not blaming George Bush. But I don’t want Jeb Bush saying, ‘My brother kept us safe,’ because Sept. 11 was one of the worst days in the history of this country.”

Bush fired back, saying the real estate mogul’s comments about the Sept. 11 attacks show that he is not serious about being commander in chief — the central theme of his new Web ad attacking Trump.

Here is the ad.

Our national security isn’t a reality TV show. https://t.co/2AyKs6dpce

— Jeb Bush (@JebBush) October 17, 2015

The clip starts out with a warning that Trump will control the nuclear weapons.

All that really does is make you picture Jeb in charge of national defense, which makes you dizzy.

The ad actually ends with “Trump Stumped.”

Jeb Bush is now trying to reverse meme The Donald.

It is a game he cannot win.

Give up now, Jeb.

Go to Mexico with your wife and criminal Mexican children and leave America alone.

We’ve been Bushed around enough.

Patrick J. Buchanan
October 21, 2015

Three months ago, this writer sent out a column entitled, “Could Trump Win?” meaning the Republican nomination.

Today even the Trump deniers concede the possibility.

And the emerging question has become: “Can Trump be stopped? And if so, where, and by whom?”

Consider the catbird seat in which The Donald sits.

An average of national polls puts him around 30 percent, trailed by Dr. Ben Carson with about 20 percent. No other GOP candidate gets double digits.

Trump is leading Carson in Iowa, running first in New Hampshire, crushing the field in Nevada and South Carolina. These are the first four contests. In Florida, Trump’s support exceeds that of ex-Governor Jeb Bush and Sen. Marco Rubio combined.

If these polls don’t turn around, big time, Trump is the nominee.

And with Thanksgiving a month off, then the Christmas season, New Year’s, college football playoffs and NFL playoffs, the interest of the nation will drift away, again and again, from politics.

Voting begins Feb. 1 in Iowa. Super Bowl Sunday is Feb. 7. And the New Hampshire primary will likely be on Tuesday, Feb. 9.

We are only three months out, and Trump still holds the high cards.

After months of speeches and TV appearances, he is a far more disciplined campaigner and communicator. In a year when a huge slice of the nation is disgusted with political correctness, wants to dethrone the establishment, wipe the slate clean and begin anew with someone fresh, Trump is in the pole position.

His issues — secure the border, send illegal immigrants back, renegotiate rotten trade deals that shipped our jobs abroad — are more in tune with the national mood than pro-amnesty, Obamatrade or NAFTA.

Wall Street Journal conservatism is in a bear market.

Trump says he will talk to Vladimir Putin, enforce the nuclear deal with Iran, not tear it up on Inauguration Day, and keep U.S. troops out of Syria. And South Korea should pay more of the freight and provide more of the troops for its own defense.

A nationalist, and a reluctant interventionist, if U.S. interests are not imperiled, Trump offers a dramatic contrast to the neocons and Hillary Clinton, the probable Democratic nominee. She not only voted for the Iraq war Trump opposed, but she helped launch the Libyan war.

The lights are burning late tonight in the suites of the establishment tonight. For not since Sen. Barry Goldwater won the California primary in 1964 have their prospects appeared so grim.

Can Trump be stopped?

Absent some killer gaffe or explosive revelation, he will have to be stopped in Iowa or New Hampshire. A rival will have to emerge by then, strong enough and resourced enough to beat him by March.

The first hurdle for the establishment in taking down Trump is Carson. In every national poll, he is second. He’s sitting on the votes the establishment candidate will need to overtake Trump.

Iowa is the ideal terrain for a religious-social conservative to upset Trump, as Mike Huckabee showed in 2008 and Rick Santorum in 2012.

But Carson has preempted part of the Evangelical and social conservative vote. Moreover, Sen. Ted Cruz, an anti-establishment man, is working Iowa and has the forensic abilities to rally social conservatives.

Should Trump fall, and his estate go to probate, Cruz’s claim would seem superior to that of any establishment favorite.

Indeed, for an establishment-backed candidate — a Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, John Kasich, Chris Christie, Bobby Jindal — to win Iowa, he must break out of the single-digit pack soon, fend off Cruz, strip Carson of part of his following, then overtake Trump. A tall order.

Yet, the battle to consolidate establishment support has begun. And despite his name, family associations, size of his Super PAC, Jeb has lost ground to Marco Rubio. Look to Marco to emerge as the establishment’s last best hope to take down Trump.

But if Trump wins in Iowa, he wins in New Hampshire.

The Iowa Caucuses then, the first contest, may well be decisive. If not stopped there, Trump may be unstoppable. Yet, as it is a caucus state where voters stick around for hours before voting, organization, intensity and endless labor can pay off big against a front-runner.

In Iowa, for example, Ronald Reagan was defeated by George H. W. Bush in 1980. Vice President Bush was defeated by Bob Dole and Pat Robertson in 1988. Reagan and Bush I needed and managed comeback victories in New Hampshire. One cannot lose Iowa and New Hampshire.

Thus, today’s task for the Republican establishment.

Between now and March, they must settle on a candidate, hope his rivals get out of the race, defeat Trump in one of the first two contests, or effect his defeat by someone like Carson, then pray Trump will collapse like a house of cards.

The improbabilities of accomplishing this grow by the week, and will soon start looking, increasingly, like an impossibility — absent the kind of celestial intervention that marked the career of the late Calvin Coolidge.

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 21, 2015

The Donald is now going all out on the Bushes, claiming that the second Bush (third Bushes brother) knew the attack was coming.

Interesting reading re September 11th http://t.co/eFgd00dZQO

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 19, 2015

(Donald Trump posted the above tweet less than 24 hours after I posted a link to that NYT article. Just saying.)

Via @IBTimes: "Under Fire From Donald Trump, Jeb Bush Focuses On 9/11 Even Though Hijackers Got Florida Licenses" https://t.co/a9s6mHsk07

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 19, 2015

See, the attack very possibly could have been stopped. We need real leadership and vision. https://t.co/JA1Fo5H6FP

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 19, 2015

Bruce Willis wearing my hat on @FallonTonight last Friday- pic.twitter.com/d2PlEBk3m2

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 19, 2015

Following a series of Tweets on the topic (and also one with Bruce Willis), the Donald took to CNN to state, in no uncertain terms, that Bush knew the attack was coming.

He said:

Look, his brother gets hit on, he’s a loyal person, and he’s loyal to his brother. But his brother made some mistakes. His brother could have made a mistake with the actual hit because they did know it was coming. And George Tenet, the head of the CIA told him that it was coming. So, they did have advanced notice and they didn’t really work on it. Now that’s something that could happen. I don’t blame him for that. Again, the question was — it wasn’t that I was blaming. They said that our country was safe under Bush. I said, well, what about the World Trade Center coming down in the worst attack in history? The statement was our country was safe under his brother.

#REKT

He is doing here exactly what he did with McCain’s war record. He never said “John McCain was a collaborator,” he just brought the issue up so that those in the know knew, and those out of the loop got a glimpse of reality.

He isn’t going to say “the Bush administration purposefully allowed 911 to happen,” but he has gotten as close as he can to saying that. And everyone who knows knows that he knows.

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 22, 2015

So, I never really thought I would ever be writing this, but it now looks like there is about a 50/50 chance Donald Trump will be the next President of the United States.

As Pat Buchanan recently wrote, it is going to be extremely difficult for the GOP to get another candidate nominated. They might end up doing it, somehow, but if they don’t, it is going to be the criminal Hillary Clinton on the Democrat side (unless the investigation intensifies and they have to go with Sanders), and I have a hard time believing that Hillary could actually beat The Donald.

It may well be that we have a perfect storm.

When I first came out and endorsed Trump, I was mostly doing it because I thought it was funny. Never did I expect that this Train would just keep on rolling. Things are different now.

Now, something incredible could actually happen: Troll President.

"@codyave: @drudgereport @BreitbartNews @Writeintrump "You Can't Stump the Trump" https://t.co/0xITB7XeJV pic.twitter.com/iF6S05se2w"

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 13, 2015

We are playing a role in this. A significant role. When I say “we,” I don’t just mean DS, but the entire internet troll community. These memes are having a serious influence on the general climate. Trump has been made cool, and many young people are actually going to go out and vote for him. I’ve never voted even once in my life, and I’ll be voting for him.

As we are playing a crucial role in a potential coup by keeping the internet energy around The Donald high, we need to be aware, and push ever harder.

The Reality Situation

We shouldn’t be overly optimistic about Trump, of course. He is not going to usher in a White Empire (even though at certain times the things he says makes one wonder if he might).

But let’s think about what he won’t do.

He won’t start a world war with Russia, as Hillary Clinton now says she wants to do.

He won’t allow completely unrestricted mass immigration, as all other candidates are planning to do, even if he doesn’t do all the deportations he is saying he’ll do.

Most importantly I think, he won’t shut down freedom of speech or pass insane gun control measures, both of which Hillary Clinton would almost certainly do in her second term.

That, and he might actually end up doing all of this stuff he says he’s going to do. He is a person with a personality, and that is something that the Jews cannot plan for.

The bottom line is that nothing bad happens if you support Trump, and a lot of good may potentially happen.

I promise you that I'm much smarter than Jonathan Leibowitz – I mean Jon Stewart @TheDailyShow. Who, by the way, is totally overrated.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 24, 2013

Trump Denialism

No matter what The Donald says or does – no matter how far he pushes things to the right – there are people on the internet who will whine and claim that it is bad to support him. This whining is almost entirely based on the fact that his adult daughter is married to a Jew.

They don’t ever explain how that means he’s controlled by Jews, or why someone who was secretly controlled by Jews would be talking about Bush being responsible for 911, closing mosques, bringing back Christmas, deporting all illegals, stopping Islamic immigration, letting Putin deal with the Middle East, and on and on forever. Everything that comes out of this guys mouth is diametrically opposed to the Jew agenda.

I am aware that there are people who genuinely believe that everything that happens is a part of a Jewish conspiracy, and basically argue that reality doesn’t exist and there is nothing anyone can do because we are already doomed by omniscient Jewish superbeings.

There are also people who get involved in far-right politics because they think its edgy, and then fail to understand what edgy is, and so end up confusing themselves into a downward spiral of trying to keep on the edge of edgy. They will say “Donald Trump is on TV so he must not be cool – I’m voting for Hitler!”

Both of these are genuine useful idiots, who exist. I don’t know their numbers.

But their numbers are probably not as great as the number of people who are currently spamming that Trump is a part of some kind of Jewish conspiracy.

We do indeed appear to be under assault from a Jew intelligence operation, attempting to kill the momentum we have helped build. It obviously isn’t working. As Trump pushing things further and further, more and more people come out and say “well, I was skeptical at first, but I’m now starting to feel it – I’m getting on this train.”

I see a lot of Trump supporters, however, getting bothered by the fact that anonymous commenters are attacking Trump, and feeling like they need to explain the situation to them.

Look.

The situation became self-explanatory months ago. Really, it was from the beginning. If someone doesn’t get it, they are either incapable of getting it due to personal problems you have no influence over, or they are not getting it on purpose.

The only response these people deserve is a question:

What are you claiming the downside of supporting Trump is?

None of them will answer that question, because there is no possible answer.

The worst possible outcome is that nothing happens, but we still would have trolled the hell out of a bunch of cucks and SJWs, as well as demonstrated to the White majority in America that the possibilities do still exist.

Keep on Spreading the Message – And Make Sure You’re Registered to Vote!

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 27, 2015

Jeb has thrown a self-pity party in public over the last couple of days, which has culminated in him saying that he doesn’t really want to be President anyway because people don’t like him and they should just vote for Trump.

Srsly.

If this election is about how we’re going to fight to get nothing done, then I don’t want anything — I don’t want any part of it. I don’t want to be elected president to sit around and see gridlock just become so dominant that people literally are in decline in their lives. That is not my motivation. I’ve got a lot of really cool things I could do other than sit around, being miserable, listening to people demonize me and feeling compelled to demonize them. That is a joke. Elect Trump if you want that.

What a soft faggot.

I mean, who campaigns on “vote for me because you feel sorry for me, because bad Donald hurt my feelings?”

And what are these “really cool things” he could do instead of being President? Watching his wife get banged by Black males?

Why is he running for President at all if there are all these “really cool things” he’d rather be doing.

This comes after Jeb again complained that Donald shouldn’t be in the race, as he cut his staff’s payments by 40%.

Jeb also recently said he thought the new Supergirl show was “hot.”

Sort of an out-of character thing for such an awkward weirdo to say, but let us consider it.

Is he saying the chick in it is hot? Or is he saying the show, which involves this blonde girl getting banged by a large Black man, is hot?

Related: Supergirl: Hot Empowered Blonde, Friendzoned Beta White Male, Alpha Negro Male

Daily Stormer already previewed the pilot of this show, and Jimmy Olsen is being played by a Black Negroid Mandingo whom blonde Supergirl is sexually interested in.

The show also contains a beta White male (played by a Jew, but the normies don’t know), who the blonde lead hero leads on for personal gain while going to the Boss Nig to get slammed.

It is produced by all Jews.

Not surprised Jeb likes it.

Kevin MacDonald
Occidental Observer
October 30, 2015

There is some anxiety among Jews about Donald Trump’s candidacy. In fathoming why this might be, one could perhaps start by asking how Trump departs from the ideal presidential candidate. For Jews, the ideal candidate is (1) predictably and fanatically pro-Israel; (2) predictably liberal/left on social issues, particularly anything related to immigration and multiculturalism; and (3) in need of big campaign money contingent on satisfying (1) and (2). There can be little doubt that Jeb Bush, who was the early favorite of Sheldon Adelson and the Republican Jewish Coalition, filled the bill quite well. But Bush now seems to be fading, with Adelson leaning toward Marco Rubio — he of the Gang of Eight immigration amnesty/surge bill and saying all the right things about Israel and the Middle East.

Trump would seem to be acceptable on Israel given his statement that “We love Israel. We will fight for Israel 100 percent, 1,000 percent. It will be there forever.” On the other  hand, he does not come across as an ideal neocon candidate, having stated that he would not have invaded Iraq (a triumph of  Israel, the neocons, and the Israel Lobby), opposes using US force for “nation-building” (another favorite neocon policy and one of the rationales for the Iraq invasion), and for his recent statements on Syria— that Putin’s support for Assad makes more sense than the US policy (“we don’t even know who we’re backing“).

And of course, Trump has long-term business connection with Jews, Jews have highly visible positions in his campaign, and his daughter has converted to Judaism. But despite all that, there have been several examples where well-connected, high-profile Jews have expressed anxiety about Trump precisely because of their Jewish identity, and it seems to me that the common denominator here is nothing less than that they see Trump as undermining elite consensus on immigration and the moral imperative of the end of White America. Or to put it less delicately, they see Trump as potentially leading to a fascist counter-revolution that would spell the end of the project, very much promoted by the Jewish community, of creating a multi-cultural, non-White America completely cut off from its pre-1965 moorings.

As often noted here, mainstream Jewish political attitudes and behavior in the US from the far left to the neoconservative right — as exemplified by the successful campaign to enact the 1965 immigration law and continued support for high levels of immigration by the entire organized Jewish community — has always been directed at lessening the demographic, political, and cultural power of White America. There are two main reasons for this — concerns that a homogeneous White America could ultimately rise up against Jews as occurred in Hitler’s Germany (see here for discussion of a recent example), and antipathy toward Christian Europeans as an outgroup seen through Jewish perceptions of historical anti-Semitism.

Indeed, Republican Jewish activists have an uphill battle getting Jews to vote Republican despite the rabid pro-Israel rhetoric emanating from the GOP and assurances from Republican Jewish activists that the Republican Party has become a party of tolerance and pluralism. The basic problem is fear and loathing of the serious Christians among the White Republican base. As Kenneth Wald, a political science professor and the Samuel R. “Bud” Shorstein professor of American Jewish Culture & Society at the University of Florida, notes,

Apart from getting rid of their base — evangelicals — I don’t see a way for Republicans to make really deep inroads in the Jewish vote. … They’ve essentially got the Jewish voters who they’re going to get, and it’s essentially the same group they’ve had for a long time, probably about a fifth to a quarter of the [Jewish] population. (“Florida’s Jewish voters a target for Republicans, but a near lock for Democrats,” Tampa Bay Times,  May 22, 2015.

This recalls the comment of Israeli patriot Elliott Abrams  acknowledging that the mainstream Jewish community in America “clings to what is at bottom a dark vision of America, as a land permeated with anti-Semitism and always on the verge of anti-Semitic outbursts.” Serious Christians tap into primal Jewish fears.

Obviously, these attitudes on immigration do not apply to all American Jews, but they do represent the thrust of Jewish power in the U.S. We know this is not a principled stance but rather is a form of ethnic strategizing in the diaspora because the organized Jewish community also supports Israel as a Jewish state that restricts immigration of non-Jews and is actively involved in the dispossession of the Palestinians.

Donald Trump’s candidacy plugs into some of these fundamental Jewish attitudes about America as a White, Christian society. Some quotes:

“There are a lot of folks who are, to be charitable, into white identity politics, and to be uncharitable are outright racists, who are supporting Trump,” said Nathan Wurtzel, a Republican political consultant and principal at The Catalyst Group, who is Jewish. “It’s very off-putting and disturbing.” (“Donald Trump’s Rise Sparks Widespread Angst Among Jewish Republicans“)

The concern that “White racists” support Trump is the focus of several articles, including Evan Osnos’ “The fearful and the frustrated” (the title is yet another example of psychoanalyzing away legitimate White interests) and Donald Perlstein’s “Donald Trump, American hustler: The frightening fascist tendencies of his GOP rise.” But why be concerned about the support of a tiny part of the electorate that explicitly voices White identities and interests? It is actually a guilt-by-association argument where the real concern is that Trump will do something on immigration, legal and illegal, that would slow White dispossession (policies that are obviously supported by White advocates but also by most Americans). This could then perhaps snowball into something far greater, with unknown consequences. Once rhetoric and policies opposed to immigration becomes legitimized, there is no telling where it will lead, and that is a huge concern for these Jewish activists. The fact is that Trump’s statements on immigration have tapped into a groundswell of popular sentiment, propelling him to a lead in all the polls. As Peter Brimelow noted, “objectively, Trump’s historical function is clearly to break the Washington Cartel and to bring the immigration issue into politics.”

Until Trump came along, there really was no mainstream politician and almost no media voices (Ann Coulter and Pat Buchanan are exceptions) that were mentioning birthright citizenship, immigrant crime, or the effects of legal immigration on the labor market. White Americans are a sleeping giant, lulled to sleep by the media, by cuckolded politicians, and by the creation an atmosphere of fear where discordant opinions are severely punished by job loss, ostracism, etc., while there are huge rewards for going along with the status quo. Jewish academic and media activists have spent the last century promoting the idea that White racial/ethnic interests do not exist, but they are well aware that this is a spark that can be lit quite easily with consequences that are impossible to predict. Even with all the propaganda, all the punishments for deviation, and all the incentives for going along with the system, politics are increasingly racialized in the U.S. (implying that racial identity rather than social class is now critical for explaining voting behavior), and there is clearly a significant segment of the White electorate that is disaffected with the Republican establishment but certainly does not see salvation with the Democrats.

When neocon Ben Wattenberg  famously asserted that “The non-Europeanization of America is heartening news of an almost transcendental quality” [The Good News Is The Bad News Is Wrong, p. 84.], he was speaking for the great majority of American Jews and certainly for the organized Jewish community. But America has not yet been non-Europeanized — at least not completely and not irreversibly. The possibility that Donald Trump could begin the process of re-Europeanizing America is horrifying to these Republican Jewish activists.

Another example of Jewish Republican angst, from “Trump, Carson have Republican Jewish establishment worried: Longtime GOP Jewish donors and activists look on in dismay as the two presidential hopefuls lead the polls“:

[Support for Trump is] a disorienting experience for longtime Republican Jewish donors and activists, who have made inroads into the party’s establishment over the last two decades, and who have been at the forefront of advocacy for tolerance and pluralism within the party.

“The tone of what they’re saying, we get painted as a party of intolerance,” said [fundraiser Fred] Zeidman, who practices law in the Houston area and backs Bush’s candidacy. …

[Op-Ed editor of the New York Post Seth] Mandel said online that white supremacist backing for Trump — who has suggested immigrants from Mexico are predominantly criminals — has been unsettling. “That will always make Jews uncomfortable, that’s why there’s so much pushback” among some Jewish conservatives against the Trump candidacy.

For the last 35 years or so, the neocons have been pushing the GOP to the left on social issues — and yes, neoconservatism is a Jewish movement. But notice that, as is so often the case, Jewish interests in a non-European America are presented as fulfilling the loftiest of moral sentiments. It’s all about pluralism and tolerance — virtues that the great majority of Americans agree with (but are completely absent from Jewish rhetoric on Israeli policies). Whites are portrayed as having a moral imperative to become a minority. This is a rhetoric that is uniquely effective in the West, with devastating results. We must understand such claims for what they are: expressions of Jewish ethnic interests that conflict with the legitimate ethnic interests of Whites in preserving their demographic and cultural dominance in societies they founded and have dominated for hundreds and, in the case of Europe, thousands of years.

Given this deep concern that Trump may imperil the project of dispossessing White America, it is not surprising that for some Jewish activists, even the most benign statements by Trump conjure up images of Hitler and National Socialism. An example also noted in Peter Brimlow’s article cited above is the statement by Ross Kaminsky writing in American Spectator that again focuses on Trump’s immigration plan:

His plan to require businesses to “hire American workers first” has the stench of xenophobia backed up by the fist of government. Perhaps as a Jew I’m overly sensitive, but when I hear Trump speak I can’t help but think of “Germany for the Germans.”

This is certainly outrageous on its face — isn’t it obvious that US immigration policy should be about the interests of Americans? But actually, it’s not obvious at all. Indeed, it reflects a deep reality—that Jewish attitudes on immigration have a long history of being explicitly unconcerned with the interests of America or its traditional majority population. Rather, the Jewish view is that immigration policy should be based on moral principles, not the interests of Americans. Immigration of all races is a sacred value, far more important than the qualities of the immigrants or what they can contribute to America.

In 1948 the [American Jewish] Committee submitted to a Senate subcommittee a statement simultaneously denying the importance of the material interests of the United States and affirming its commitment to immigration of all races: “Americanism is not to be measured by conformity to law, or zeal for education, or literacy, or any of these qualities in which immigrants may excel the nativeborn. Americanism is the spirit behind the welcome that America has traditionally extended to people of all races, all religions, all nationalities” [stated at a time when the 1924 immigration law biasing immigration to Northwest Europe was still in force] (see here, p. 274; see also pp. 277-278).

Again reflecting the low threshold for linking Trump with National Socialism, Bethany Mandel, also writing in The Forward  finds that, as with Kaminsky, Trump conjures up images of Germany in the 1930s:

Since his campaign has taken off, Trump has spent a good deal of energy playing dumb when it comes to the overwhelming nature of the support for his candidacy from white nationalists and neo-Nazis. Worse than Trump’s willful blindness is the rhetoric he uses to stoke racial unrest with a slogan — “Make America Great Again” — reminiscent of the Nazi Party of the 1930s.

Finally, at the most hyperbolic end of the spectrum is Donald Perlstein’s article “Donald Trump, American hustler: The frightening fascist tendencies of his GOP rise,” originally posted at the Washington Spectator but deemed so important that it was re-posted by Salon.  Perlstein’s intellectual roots can be seen in his quoting Philip Rahv, “a founding editor of the marquee intellectual journal Partisan Review.” PR was the flagship journal of the New York Intellectuals, an influential Jewish intellectual movement that was an early proponent of the the idea that American democracy required a commitment, as Sidney Hook phrased it in 1948, to “a maximum of cultural [and ethnic] diversity” (see previous link, p. 220) — a good example of Jewish intellectuals promoting the transcendent value of ethnic and cultural diversity as far more important than any material interests of the United States much less the ethnic interests of White Americans.

(Likewise, Evan Osnos, in his New Yorker article on Trump and the White nationalists,  cites another famous New York Intellectual who pathologized legitimate White interests, pointing to “the crude tribalism that Richard Hofstadter [see here, p. 195) named “the paranoid style”—and, over the summer, it replicated like a runaway mutation.” These are good examples of how Jewish media figures can easily and confidently plug into Jewish intellectual traditions that are fundamentally hostile to the legitimate interests of the traditional American majority.)

Perlstein all but accuses Trump of being the second coming of Hitler:

Donald Trump is not a fascist––probably.

His ex-wife Ivana once claimed he kept a volume of Hitler’s collected speeches in a cabinet by his bed, and read from time to time the fuhrer’s vision of human life as a pitiless war of all against all. “If I had these speeches, and I am not saying that I do, I would never read them,” he told Vanity Fair in 1990. But consider something the architect of Trump Tower, Der Scutt, once said on how to evaluate the truth value of Donald Trump claims: “divide by two, then divide by four, and you’re closer to the answer.”

Again, the crux of the issue is Trump’s immigration plan:

Trump has now provided more “specifics” about his immigration plan: a forced population transfer greater than any attempted in history, greater than the French and Spanish expulsions of the Jews in 1308 and 1492; greater than the Nabka of approximately 700,000 Palestinian Arabs from British-mandate Palestine; greater than the 1.5 million Stalin consigned to Siberia and the Central Asian republics; greater than Pol Pot’s exile of 2.5 million city-dwellers to the Cambodian countryside, or the scattering of Turkey’s Assyrian Christians, which the scholar Mordechai Zaken says numbers in the millions and required 180 years to complete.  Trump has promised to move 12 million Mexicans in under two years––“so fast your head will spin.”

For some reason, Perlstein ignores the expulsion of 12 million Germans from Eastern Europe after World War II — by some estimates the same as the number of illegals in the US now. I suspect that Perlstein sees the German expulsions as just fine even if they resulted in an estimated 2 million deaths and untold suffering. No need to complicate his simple narrative of moral righteousness with the horror of what actually happened to German civilians during and after the war, often with active Jewish complicity (see previous link).

Other signs of incipient American fascism noted by Perlstein:

Last fall, the Public Religion Research Institute found that a majority of whites believe “discrimination against whites has become as big a problem as discrimination against blacks and other minorities.”

Shouldn’t we at least link to a discussion of why this belief is wrongheaded, given the rather hostile attitudes towards Whites pursuing their legitimate interests that are so apparent among the Donald Perlsteins of the world and appearing in elite media outlets like Salon?

A brand new Washington Post/ABC poll finds 57 percent of Republicans support the most massive ethnic cleansing in the annals of humanity (or, what The Washington Post blandly calls “Trump’s tough positions on immigration”).

Actually, most Americans support Trump’s immigration plan. But for Perlstein, Trump and most Americans are incipient fascists for wanting an immigration policy that serves their interests.

Since I can’t really take seriously the notion that Donald Trump would actually attempt, much less succeed, in rolling back the last 50 years, I see these expressions of Jewish angst more as a sign of Jewish political neurosis than anything rooted in reality. These writers and political operatives have an incredibly low threshold for detecting incipient fascism. But make no mistake, this political neurosis is having and will continue to have very real effects on the 2016 race. One can only imagine the deluge of propaganda if indeed Trump was seen as having a very real chance of winning. The 1964 ads predicting nuclear Armageddon if Barry Goldwater was elected would be small potatoes by comparison.

Pictures/captions added by the Daily Stormer

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 30, 2015

There were some questions about Trump’s answer to a question about H1-B workers in the CNBC debate. The question was about Mark Zuckerberg, and Trump’s answer seemed weird and unrelated to the question.

He has spoken to Breitbart, and cleared-up his position on H1-B workers.

BNN: The media has been filled with stories about companies flying in low-wage H-1B workers to replace American workers in tech jobs. Adding insult to injury, these American workers have been forced to train their replacements. If you were President, would you put a stop to this practice?

DT: Day one. This is why I got into this race. Because the everyday working person in this country is getting screwed. Lobbyists write the rules to benefit the rich and powerful. They buy off Senators like Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) to help them get rich at the expense of working Americans by using H-1B visas–so called “high tech” visas–to replace American workers in all sorts of solid middle class jobs. If I am President, I will not issue any H-1B visas to companies that replace American workers and my Department of Justice will pursue action against them.

BNN: Hundreds of workers at Disney were forced to train their foreign replacements. But while Florida Senator Nelson rallied to their cause, Senator Rubio did not. While Nelson has called for an investigation, Rubio has not. While Nelson has called to reduce H-1Bs, Rubio has demanded more. Senator Rubio has been the top promoter in Congress for expanding the H-1B program even though millions American tech workers are out of jobs. Rubio’s new bill triples H-1Bs and has zero protections for American workers. Advocates for tech workers said Rubio’s bill would “destroy” the U.S. tech workforce. Rubio’s bill is even endorsed by the CEO of Disney. What do you think of Rubio’s bill?

DT: It’s a disaster. It would allow any company in America to replace any worker with cheaper foreign labor. It legalizes job theft. It gives companies the legal right to pass over Americans, displace Americans, or directly replace Americans for good-paying middle class jobs. More than 80 percent of these H-1Bs are paid less than the average wage. Senator Rubio works for the lobbyists, not for Americans. That is why he is receiving more money from Silicon Valley than any other candidate in this race. He is their puppet.

BNN: During the debate, Senator Rubio listed several protections he thought American workers should receive. But the New York Times said Rubio’s bill would does the opposite of what he said, and does not contain a single one of the protections he mentioned. Instead, his bill simply triples the number of H-1B visas given as low-wage substitutes to corporations. Does Rubio have a problem with the truth?

DT: Yes, Senator Rubio is incapable of telling the truth. He should be disqualified for dishonesty alone.

BNN: Do you think agree with Senator Rubio that there is a shortage of talented Americans?

DT: Rubio is dead wrong. America produces the best and brightest in the world. It’s time to stand up for own students–many of whom are racked with terrible, terrible debt and facing a disastrous job market. We are graduating two times more students in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) than find jobs in those fields every year. We have a surplus of talented Americans and we need them to get jobs first.

BNN: What should happen with the Florida workers who have been replaced?

DT: I am calling TODAY on Disney to hire back every one of the workers they replaced, and I am calling on Rubio to immediately rescind his sponsorship of the I-Squared bill and apologize to every Floridian for endorsing it. I am further calling on Rubio to return the money he has received from Silicon Valley CEOs and to donate the money to a charity helping unemployed Americans whose jobs Rubio has helped to destroy.

So, Trump is vowing not only to remove burrito, but to remove curry as well. He has previously vowed to remove kebab.

No one knows if he could or would actually do any of this, but the fact that he is saying it means so much. There is literally no one else in the mainstream media, at all (save Coulter and Buchanan) talking about the plague of legal immigration. Trump is normalizing this, and no matter what happens with the election, America is better for it.

This is now a part of the discussion.

The Overton Window hath been shifted rightward.

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 6, 2015

I can’t believe this Magic Negro thing just keeps going.

This guy was a brain surgeon and now he’s going to be President because he’s Black? Wat?

Politico:

Donald Trump took a major swipe at Ben Carson on Thursday, picking up on reporting suggesting that the retired neurosurgeon fabricated anecdotes about his violent past in order to create a narrative of personal redemption.

“The Carson story is either a total fabrication or, if true, even worse-trying to hit mother over the head with a hammer or stabbing friend!” Trump tweeted.

Trump’s tweet comes after CNN published an article questioning several stories Carson told in his 1990 autobiography, “Gifted Hands: The Ben Carson Story.” Recalling his “pathological temper” both in the book and in speeches and interviews since, Carson describes “punching a classmate in the face with his hand wrapped around a lock, leaving a bloody three-inch gash in the boy’s forehead; attempting to attack his own mother with a hammer following an argument over clothes,” according to CNN. He also described attempting to stab someone, only to be foiled by a belt buckle.

See.

Only a Black would say things like this and expect people to believe it.

A Black, or a Jew at Nuremberg.

Carson has credited his Christian faith with helping him overcome this volatile past — but CNN was unable to corroborate any of the details, and those who knew Carson described the self-portrait he painted in his book as “unrecognizable,” according to the network.

…

The story and questions about his past have put Carson on the defensive, especially when asked by a CNN reporter on Thursday about who the victims are.

“Well, why would you be able to find them? What makes you think you would be able to find them? Unless I tell you who they are. And if they come forward on their own, because of your story, that’s fine, but I’m not going to expose them,” Carson said, when the reporter confronted him at an event to promote his latest book.

Later on Thursday, during an appearance on Fox News’ “The Kelly File,” Carson said the person he attempted to stab is a close relative, but that he or she did not want their name released. That differs from earlier accounts, in which Carson described the person as a classmate, according to The Daily Beast.

LOL.

Keep it simple, Coaltrain! It’s the first rule of lying!

I’m starting to think you’re not magic after all!

There are only two true Magic Negroes known to mankind:

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 6, 2015

Yesterday we reported on the disgusting video of ugly bean children attacking the Donald with foul-language.

Some speculate that it was staged by a Trump supporter, as all it did was prove everything Trump is saying about this hostile, criminal and parasitical race which has waylaid our once great nation.

Others have speculated that Hillary Clinton did it, and this bitch is really just that stupid that she thinks this made Mexicans sympathetic.

In reality, where many of us still prefer to reside, this did the one thing the Mexican lobby wouldn’t ever want to do, which is make it so even the children are not sympathetic, coming across as hateful, dangerous and physically repulsive.

The organization is called “Deport Racism.” The video featured the children screaming that America belongs to them, which would have woken up a bit of racial sentiment in even the most liberal of persons. It would happen on a biological level, an understanding that you are being physically threatened.

Here’s the Man.

Politico:

Donald Trump on Friday tore into the video from a Hispanic advocacy group featuring children swearing at him for his stance on immigration, calling it “terrible” and a “disgrace.”

“F–k you, racist f–k,” a child identified as Ricardo tells Trump in the video released earlier this week by Deport Racism PAC.

The same group has also offered $5,000 to anyone on the “Saturday Night Live” cast or audience who uses the words “deport racism” or “Trump is racist” live on the air during his hosting appearance this weekend.

“I think it’s terrible, I think it’s just terrible,” the Republican presidential candidate said on Fox Business Network’s “Mornings with Maria Bartiromo.”

Young kids speaking that way “is a disgrace,” he added, “and it totally backfired and people are actually going wild about it and they’re saying we’re going to support Trump.”

“Anybody that would do an ad like that is stupid, to be honest,” Trump went on, “I mean, they’re stupid people that would do an ad like that,” adding that he would win the Hispanic vote because he would bring back jobs from countries like India and China.

El Lobo Marco tried to do damage control for his racial kin.

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio had even harsher words for the parents of the children who participated in the ad, which he called “outrageous” in an interview on “Fox and Friends.”

“First of all, it’s counterproductive. Who do these groups think they’re impressing by doing this?” Rubio asked. “They’re not bringing anybody to their side. They’re turning people off. People are looking at it and say, these people are grotesque. I mean these are little children. What kind of parent allows their children to go on a video like that and use that kind of profanity and what kind of parents allow a kid to do that?”

“Grotesque.” Yes, that is the word.

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 8, 2015

Donald Trump was on Saturday Night Live last night. I can’t post the torrent of the episode, because that would be illegal.

Entertainment Weekly:

With Donald Trump hosting, Saturday Night Live jumped to its biggest overnight rating since 2012.

According to NBC, SNL had a whopping 6.6 household rating on Saturday night, easily beating the season’s previous high: the 41st season premiere last month, hosted by Miley Cyrus and with a guest appearance by none other than … Hillary Clinton. In fact, Trump’s overnight rating was 47 percent higher than the Miley/Hillary episode.

The previous high was held by an episode that aired Jan. 7, 2012, hosted by Charles Barkley with musical guest Kelly Clarkson.

Saturday night marked the Republican presidential hopeful’s second time hosting the iconic late-night series. He previously acted as host in 2004 when Trump was still the host of NBC’s The Apprentice.

Trump was pretty confident he’d boost SNL’s numbers. “I get the best ratings,” he reportedly said when asked about the appearance.

The actual number of SNL viewers will be available later in the week. But for point of comparison, the season premiere delivered 6.3 million viewers, so Trump’s episode could be close to 10 million.

Wetbacks outside held up signs claiming The Donald is in the KKK.

Noticeable protests outside NBC for @realDonaldTrump on SNL. People chanting, beating drums. pic.twitter.com/kKGjfwa6QY

— Frank Pallotta (@frankpallotta) November 8, 2015

Weird that New Anonymous didn’t manage to expose his membership.

The Jew Larry David called him a racist as he played Bernie Sanders.

CNN:

For a moment, viewers’ hearts jumped when someone could be heard screaming “Trump is a racist!”

The heckler turned out to be Larry David, who showed up as Bernie Sanders in the show’s cold open.

“I heard if I yelled that they’d give me $5,000,” David said.

Trump said with a shrug, “As a businessman I can respect that.”

A Latino group had offered a $5,000 “bounty” to anyone in the show’s audience who would yell “Trump is a racist” during the NBC broadcast.

The group, DeportRacism.com, said following David’s “outburst” that it would give the money to David.

“We are excited to reward the Larry David with $5,000 cash for ‘standing up’ to Donald Trump on Saturday Night Live and speaking the truth about his anti-Latino racism, even though he was joking,” the group said.

This is the same group that made the video with the bean children cursing.

William Martel
Daily Stormer
November 9, 2015

When it comes to immigration issue, it is of no surprise that the Mestizo and otherwise hybrid races of the world will always look out for their own interests at the expense of all others.

In the HuffPo “Latin Voices” section, there was an article that reported on actress Zoe Saldana’s response to anti-immigration policies, where she pretty much came out and told us to “deal with it.”

It seems that it is The Donald who is guilty of really hurting her feels more than anyone else:

While several political pundits and presidential candidates have actively expressed their plans to build border walls and tighten immigration policy, it’s Donald Trump’s description of Mexican immigrants crossing the border as “rapists” and criminals in June that has received the most attention.

Zoe cries some spicy tears:

“This topic of immigration hurts because I don’t want to be angry anymore,” Saldana told Latina. “I don’t believe that what anybody else is saying is true about me or my people. I’m kind of embarrassed when you see all of these people talking on national television, and it’s like, ‘Oh my God, if your grandfather were alive today, when he came here from Ireland, from Italy, escaped the f**king war in Russia. You’re rotting his name to shame. It doesn’t matter how much money you have, or how many degrees from Ivy League schools. You’re such a bigot. You’re such a hick right now.’”

The fact is Zoe, as the Donald pointed out, your people are indeed coming here committing crimes, raping and killing American citizens; all while abusing our system and taking advantage of our kindness. We also know you don’t want to assimilate, and that you wish to replace us and turn our country into the same 3rd-world cesspools you fled from.

Do you realize that your people can’t maintain a culture built by the white Europeans who created it, otherwise they would have? Do you realize that if you become a majority, that you will turn this nation into the same crap-hole you fled from? Of course you don’t, because you probably have an IQ equivalent to that of a golf ball.

The Huff continues:

The “Avatar” star went on to say people who feel threatened by American Latinos should understand that “the only true American here is the Native American” and Latinos are going through the same acculturation process the Irish and other cultures have gone through before.

First of all, you cannot be fully assimilated because you are totally of a different race than the European groups who were able to shed their cultures and become “Americans” without destroying the racial foundation of the nation. You mestizos would only dilute our gene pool and create a nation within a nation, which would only lead to more conflict between our peoples and further divide this nation. We also have no interest in genetically blending ourselves out of existence just so you can feel at home.

Secondly, you don’t wish to assimilate. Not only do your people insist on not learning English, but also are imposing their culture on us; all while demanding that we change our ways, take down our flags, etc., since everything about us offends them. You even have the audacity to tell us to change our laws to favor more foreign invasion!

So the real question is, why even come here at all? The only logical answer to that question is that you are here to rape, plunder and colonize our nation, which is exactly what is happening right before our very eyes.

In regards to natives being the only “true Americans,” this is actually debatable. But I’ll entertain your silly argument, which so happens to be one that is used constantly by these invader types to justify the colonization of other people’s land. Zoe’s logic, like most low IQ invaders, is basically saying something along the lines of this: “Well you stole the land first, so now its our turn to steal it, but we aren’t in the wrong because you stole it first.”

The fact of the matter is, land doesn’t belong to anyone – countries do. Land and countries are not the same thing. Countries are social constructs built on land by people who conquer and develop that land. The borders of countries can expand and contract as they have many times throughout world history. Land is not a social construct, therefore, the “land argument” is simply a false equivalence.

Furthermore, the “Natives” didn’t found the nation of America; it was founded by white Europeans, and these are the only people who can maintain this nation as it is. It wasn’t Native American, African, Chinese or any other culture that made America one of the greatest nations that ever existed; it was European culture that did. Making white people a minority in the US  would be no different than making the Chinese the minority in China, and expecting it to be the same country. If you you change the people, you change the country, but the land always remains.

But Zoe and her ilk don’t care about countries, cultures, or even other peoples. These invaders only care about advancing the interests of their “raza” while getting free stuff in the process.

Now this is where she decides to get fanatical in her emotional and hypocritical “muh people” state of mind:

“You can’t kill us. You can’t send us back. We are millions and millions here because it is our time to migrate,” Saldana told the magazine. “We are the youngest culture. We are doing what your people did. So shut up and just deal with it. Adjust your laws, because it’s not going away. If anything, I want to give them a hug, and say, ‘It’s okay. It’s new. Don’t be scared. We’re great people. We’re gonna do great and better things for your country. Trust me.’ We’re not angry either. We’re a culture that isn’t angry.”

The gringos have awakened, and we are not in the mood for anymore tacos. We are beginning to stand up against your invasion and it’s only going to get worse for you. So why don’t YOU SHUT UP AND DEAL WITH IT?