The Donald’s attacks on other Republicans have been the best part of his campaign. I just about snapped when he told Rick Perry to get an IQ test before running for President, and this latest attack on the fag Lindsey Graham is even funnier.
Before a live audience (and television audience) in Graham’s home state of South Carolina, he gave out Graham’s telephone number, and told his constitutes to call him, saying, “give it a shot. He won’t fix anything, but at least he’ll talk to you.”
He said that Graham had given him the number while begging him to help him get on Fox and Friends. Describing the conversation, he says “and I’m sitting there thinking ‘what, is this guy a beggar?'”
It was a great way to bury the McCain drama. Beautifully played.
Here the Donald describes a phone conversation he had with a friend who was complaining about getting calls from Hispanics. He says, “Terry be tough, they’ll be gone, one day, one day.”
Straight killing it.
By the way, the clip (not sure which speech it was from, he’s been giving so many) was uploaded to LiveLeak by an anti-Trumpster, who writes in the description: “Is The Donald going to chuck out all of the Hispanics from America if he gets elected?”
As if this is a bad thing.
Here’s the tags he used:
So then in the sidebar, we get a bearded child-rapist prison gang member next to the Donald.
The Dissidenti™™ and their frazzled hall monitors buzzsaw with talk about “cuckservatives.” It’s the shiv du jour, you see. As shivs go, it is in this ‘umble narrator’s opinion one of the more lethal of the semantic shanks employed by dark realists.
Lovers and haters of the Cuck Shiv gird for battle (well, the haters girdle for battle). The wielders love the twist of their shiny new toy. The haters brace defensively, shielding vitals. As well they should. CH commenters wonder, not without historical wonderment precedent for questions of Realtalk™ provenance aligned with Chateau themes, was it Heartiste who coined the “cuckservative” scarlet C? Answer: I don’t know. The first mention of it here is dated 24 Jun 2015. I suspect Poasting Whytes were first in the field with their version. Perhaps the term was independently formulated by multiple parties, inspired to simultaneous Phoenixian birth by the polluted cascade of daily poz.
I can tell you this for certain: The term “cuckold”, and its related emotional resonance, was thrust rudely into the public consciousness and popularized right here, at Chateau Heartiste, long before the current fascination with the pregnant (heh) weight of the slur. Kneejerk anti-truthers and perplexed alt-rightists scoffed at first contact with Le Chateau’s musings on the metadeath genetic threat cuckoldry poses to men, but in time even they began to see the value of the concept as a right and proper fitting metaphor for supplicants and sycophants and self-sodomizers of various stripes, which of course means they understood on a sub-discourse level the biomechanic sexual market truth implied by the insult.
Very basically, the cuckservative is a white gentile conservative (or libertarian) who thinks he’s promoting his own interests but really isn’t. In fact, the cuckservative is an extreme universalist and seems often to suffer from ethnomasochism & pathological altruism. In short, a cuckservative is a white (non-Jewish) conservative who isn’t racially aware.
That’s a serviceable academic description. I prefer something a leetle more… pungent.
CH definition: A cuckservative is a cowardly pussy who sucks up to leftoid equalists for mercy and pisses himself when he gets accused of racism, sexism, or anti-semitism.
Corollary to the above CH definition: The cuckservative will throw his brother and his nation under the bus if it means he keeps his token status as cog in the Hivemind machine. Those cocktail parties aren’t going to attend themselves!
So what’s the difference between a cuckservative and a garden variety shitlib? Delayed reaction. The cuckservative may or may not be a true believer in reality-denying feminism or anti-white antiracism, but he sure as hell knows to stick his crabbed finger in the air to see which cheek he should spread for his equalist overlord’s strap-on.
Some common traits of the species homo homo cuckservative:
is quick to jump down the throat of any Realtalker.
distances himself immediately from any ostensible ally who lets slip a jarring sin against the Narrative.
will never once, not once, do or say something brave in his life.
is at heart the rear-end of a lemming herd. won’t take a stand (or a plunge) until the numbers safely allow him to do so.
is ignorant of or afraid to confront racial, ethnic, tribal truths.
would rather bear witness to national decline and dissolution and preside over gross injustice than be on record that there are consequential race and sex differences beyond skin color and genitalia.
thinks the only difference between the sexes that is acceptable to utter in public is the male penchant for gags and buttplugs. (he also projects wildly)
dreadfully fears social ostracism, rendering him politically impotent.
will force himself to clap loudly for pre-op Bruce Jenner, to coo falsely over mystery meat infants, to nod soberly in agreement when the pay gap lie is mentioned yet again as gospel truth, to pretend that Michelle Obama is attractive, and to insist women’s soccer is just as thrilling to watch as men’s soccer (which is not much thrilling to begin with).
Will give every shrieking leftoid the benefit of the doubt while reflexively questioning the motives of every ballsy Realtalker.
will preface every feeble tiptoe into his own Realtalk wading pool with an ass-covering “To be sure…” or a spastic impromptu paean to Martin Luther King, Jr.
backs down with a quickness at roundtable debates with aggressive liberals.
the only topics on which he won’t back down are taxes on the oligarchs and fighting terrorists over there so we don’t have to fight them here (while insisting open borders are American as apple pie and that muslim dude who shot dead a platoon of Christian soldiers was really a victim of discrimination and now, now, let’s not get crazy and question our shared enthusiasm for increasing Diversity™ in the military).
will intone “diversity is our strength” while commuting home to an upscale gated community that is 98% White and 2% East Asian.
exclaims “content of our character”, “fighting for freedom”, “blacks kill other blacks more than any other race”, and “hispanics are natural conservatives” without a hint of ironic detachment.
has probably sexually molested a young boy sometime before his political career took off.
Cuckservatives are even more loathsome than true blue leftoid believers in the antiwhite progrom, because at least you can say the latter are loyal to a personal, if mortally twisted, ethos. The cuckservative is loyal to nothing but personal aggrandizement. The cuckservative so easily betrays his stated principles because, in fact, he has no principles. He is a globocorporate transnational post-american striver SWPL just as much as any of his ultraliberal co-evals, minus the overt eagerness for estate taxes and nationalized healthcare, and he’ll be damned if he’ll let some flyover smart-ass with an eye for both the big picture and the demonic detail to destabilize his easy-livin’ sinecure.
Given this list of characteristics, the “cuckold” root of the cuckservative metaphor is exceedingly apt. The cuckservative is, in habit of mind and sometimes in practice, that pathetic white man with noodle arms and crusted tear tracks sitting hunched on a stool in the corner of his bedroom watching, with willing fervor, his ecstatic white wife get pounded into post-white release by a buck nigra who eats his food and kicks his ass when the fridge needs refilling.
Yes, he’ll sit there nicely and putter with his pud while his wife (nation) gets banged out by another man (nonwhites, third world immigrants), as long as no one mistakes him for a small town prole who can’t tell the nose difference between a merlot and a pinot noir.
The cuckservative is cucked by antagonistic races, by antagonistic ideologies, by antagonistic corporate masters, by antagonistic talk show hosts, by antagonistic fat losers editorializing on the internet equivalent of teen beat gossip rags.
All he wants is their approval. A pat on the head from his sworn and intractable enemies. He swears he’ll keep his hands to himself and won’t cum until instructed to do so!
He is a low self-esteem, approval-seeking, whimpering cumlapper.
Amazingly, some cuckservatives are LITERAL CUCKSERVATIVES. Commenter james1 peruses a few famous biographies,
It’s interesting that even though the Boehner family and the Bush family are Republicans, they are bigger race mixers than the Kennedy family and the Clinton family are Democrats. Jeb Bush married a Mestiza who looks like the maid at your local Motel 6 or Days Inn and John Boehner’a daughter married a Jamaican pothead who is a wannabe Bob Marley.
Also the Republican John McCain adopted a very dark skin girl from Sri Lanka while JFK/Jackie O and Bill/Hillary who are Democrats never adopted any Nonwhite children.
Literal cuckservatives take their prostrate mewling before the antiwhite mob a little too seriously. But with a familial C.V. like, for example, Boehner’s or ¡Jabe!’s, is it a surprise that these self-abnegating genetic dead ends can’t think clearly on the subject of race, borders, nation?
As Occam’s Razor puts it,
On the other hand, the idea of whites acting as a group to secure their own interests terrifies the cuckservative. If you ever want to troll a cuckservative, just repeatedly use the word “white,” such as “this isn’t beneficial for the white community.” The cuckservative will be triggered immediately.
Nobody gets triggered like a nancygoy cuckservative gets triggered. Truly pathetic specimens of manhood. Wasn’t Boehner the puffboy who blubbered like a baby on stage recollecting his time in the bathhouses of the Castro District? With “leaders” and “representatives” like him, who needs an opposition party? If Boehner wants a real reason to cry, he should reflect on his daughter’s coal burning, doing her part to destroy an aesthetic, cultural, and genetic heritage 20,000 years in the making.
The Cuckservative: Re-raising equalist leftoids, because, hey, he’s got something to disprove.
The gay bastard Anderson Cooper is the latest to attempt to Stump the Trump.
He has failed miserably.
He even pulled the Black card – no dice, you gerbil abuser!
“You ask me a question, I give you an answer – it’s very simple.” -Donald Trump
One of the best interviews yet. The man is on fire.
A burning pillar of Ultimate Justice.
The Trump Train runs on liberal and cuckservative tears. And it has no brakes. The Trump Train was literally built without any type of braking mechanism.
Glenn Beck like the entire Republican party is a big Jew hoax.
I never understood the appeal of this whiny faggot Glenn Beck. He always struck me as a total phony and someone who you’d just like to punch in the face.
Now a couple of his sexually impaired sit in hosts announced that they have banned any further discussion of Donald Trump on the show. This proves that Beck’s entire broadcast has been a hoax from the very start. As an alleged conservative broadcaster who is supposed to represent the interests of most White Americans, how can you ban the discussion of a presidential candidate who is boldly talking about the illegal immigration problem? Regardless of what you think of Trump, this is an incredibly stupid move.
I’ve known Beck to be a fraud for years but this should be the final nail in this guy’s coffin. Beck is a total hoax and a traitor to America.
The Glenn Beck Program has announced that they will no longer host any discussion of Donald Trump, period.
The online radio show, which is being guest hosted by Pat Gray and Stu Burguiere during Beck’s medical leave, opened with the announcer reading, “It’s The Glenn Beck Program with Pat and Stu, now 100% Trump free, with 100% Less Trump.”
“…As you just heard 100% Trump free, now 100% less Donald Trump talk,” Gray said to open the show.
“I’m sick of it, so we’re moving on,” said Burguiere. “I just can’t do another show on it.”
The cuckold fetishists running the GOP said that Trump would go down after his accurate comments on John McCain’s war record.
Once again, they were wrong.
A new YouGov poll, done after the comments on McCain, still has The Donald in first place, with 28%.
The cuck Jeb Bush has 14%.
What is shocking is that Trump’s support base is not larger.
Granted, 10% chose him as their second choice, so I guess they can be considered supporters on some level, bringing his support up to 38%. But that still leaves 62% of the GOP not endorsing Trump.
The non-Trump GOP
Who are these Republicans that are against him?
Do they want to see America destroyed? Do they get off on it, like the Democrats?
Or are they so stupid that they believe the rat Jew media which says that a career politician, who has accomplished literally nothing of substance in his entire life, can run a country better than a man who made billions of dollars in successful business ventures?
I honestly don’t know, but it is certainly difficult to comprehend that when offered the opportunity to deport Mexicans and renegotiate trade deals, Republicans would rather lose to Hillary by supporting a cuck with zero character (all non-Trump candidates).
If the White conservative base of America truly wants to see the nation destroyed completely, then this is their chance. Divine providence has given them the chance, with The Donald, to change the nation’s direction, but they are not going to get another chance.
Donald Trump has taken the opportunity of speaking in Iowa – where he is closing in on first place – to explain campaign financing to the people.
He also attacked the rat Scott Walker, who is a complete failure at all things and supported the scam of Common Core.
“The system is all the same.” -Donald Trump
Here’s a portion of the transcript:
DONALD TRUMP: I don’t want your money, I don’t need your money, you have no control over me, bye bye.
Here’s what happens with President Walker (whose state, by the way, is a disaster, but I won’t say that).
Or President Bush, or President Hillary Clinton if she makes it.
Well, it is all the same, to be honest. It is all the system, it is all the same…
These aren’t stupid people, they probably know that building a plant in Mexico is not exactly the best thing that can happen for us, so they may even try to stop it.
They will be bombarded by lobbyists that donate a lot of money to them.
Again, Jeb [Bush] raised $107 million so far.
Okay?
They’re not putting that money up because it is like a wonderful charity?
Although it is a charity, but not for this country, for other countries.
So, their lobbyists, their special interests will start calling them. President Bush, President Clinton, President Walker. Pretty much whoever is president…
(Other than me.)
They’ll call and say “this guy gave a million dollars to your campaign, this one gave two, this one gave five. You have no choice, you’ve got to do it.”
You know what he’ll say?
“Okay. I’ll do it.”
And the plant will be built in Mexico, and we just lost lots of plants across our country.
Whatever you think of Donald Trump, there is no doubt that most of the hardcore opposition to him is coming from the Jews. It was a Jew who tried to stump him on the John McCain war hero gibberish, Jewish-owned media outlets coming at him 24/7.
And Jews are a people whom no one has ever accused of having shame. They are now bringing up an ancient rape allegation (which was not actually a rape allegation) made by Trump’s wife, Ivana, during their divorce in the nineties.
We’re at the bottom of the barrel already?
The Jewish publication The Daily Beast was the first to unearth this hoax in an article written by Tim Mak (Asian) and Brandy Zadrozny (Jew).
Not only does the current frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination have a history of controversial remarks about sexual assault, but as it turns out, his ex-wife Ivana Trump once used “rape” to describe an incident between them in 1989. She later said she felt “violated” by the experience.
…
Beastly Asian Tim Mak
Ivana Trump’s assertion of “rape” came in a deposition—part of the early ’90s divorce case between the Trumps, and revealed in the 1993 book Lost Tycoon: The Many Lives of Donald J. Trump.
The book, by former Texas Monthly and Newsweek reporter Harry Hurt III, described a harrowing scene. After a painful scalp reduction surgery to remove a bald spot, Donald Trump confronted his then-wife, who had previously used the same plastic surgeon.
“Your fucking doctor has ruined me!” Trump cried.
What followed was a “violent assault,” according to Lost Tycoon. Donald held back Ivana’s arms and began to pull out fistfuls of hair from her scalp, as if to mirror the pain he felt from his own operation. He tore off her clothes and unzipped his pants.
“Then he jams his penis inside her for the first time in more than sixteen months. Ivana is terrified… It is a violent assault,” Hurt writes. “According to versions she repeats to some of her closest confidantes, ‘he raped me.’”
Following the incident, Ivana ran upstairs, hid behind a locked door, and remained there “crying for the rest of night.” When she returned to the master bedroom in the morning, he was there.
“As she looks in horror at the ripped-out hair scattered all over the bed, he glares at her and asks with menacing casualness: ‘Does it hurt?’” Hurt writes.
Donald Trump has previously denied the allegation. In the book, he denies having had the scalp reduction surgery.
“It’s obviously false,” Donald Trump said of the accusation in 1993, according to Newsday. “It’s incorrect and done by a guy without much talent… He is a guy that is an unattractive guy who is a vindictive and jealous person.”
This was in the heat of a divorce, and women (sometimes even men) tend to lie a lot when in that situation.
The fact he never had the surgery she was talking about is evidenced by the fact he still has a bald spot.
Since the Beast published the article, Ivana has come out and said she was lying, Fox News reports.
On Tuesday, the Trump campaign released a statement from Ivana Trump saying:
“I have recently read some comments attributed to me from nearly 30 years ago at a time of very high tension during my divorce from Donald. The story is totally without merit. Donald and I are the best of friends and together have raised 3 children that we love and are very proud of. I have nothing but fondness for Donald and wish him the best of luck on his campaign. Incidentally, I think he would make an incredible president.”
What is interesting about the situation, from an anti-Semitic angle, is how horrible Trump’s Jewish lawyer, Michael Cohen, responded to the Asian reporter. The Jew Ben Jacobs related the confrontation in The Guardian.
But Cohen, Trump’s lawyer and a spokesman who has helped control his candidate’s message in maintaining the Republican poll lead over more experienced politicians, went much further than that. According to the Daily Beast, he issued a series of vulgar quotes when questioned by its reporter.
“I will make sure that you and I meet one day while we’re in the courthouse. And I will take you for every penny you still don’t have. And I will come after your Daily Beast and everybody else that you possibly know,” Cohen told the website. “So I’m warning you, tread very fucking lightly, because what I’m going to do to you is going to be fucking disgusting. You understand me?”
The attorney then went on to issue direct threats regarding the resurfaced assertions: “You write a story that has Mr. Trump’s name in it, with the word ‘rape’, and I’m going to mess your life up … for as long as you’re on this frickin’ planet.”
“[Y]ou’re going to have judgments against you, so much money, you’ll never know how to get out from underneath it,” Cohen told the Daily Beast.
But the lawyer’s most specious claim in the vociferous interview arrived in a false assertion about the law: “You’re talking about the front-runner for the GOP, presidential candidate, as well as private individual who never raped anybody. And, of course, understand that by the very definition, you can’t rape your spouse,” he said.
“It is true,” Cohen told the Daily Beast. “You cannot rape your spouse. And there’s very clear case law.”
Why would Cohen, who is surely a shrewd Jew, deal so horribly with a reporter, making a statement so offensive to modern sensibilities?
If I didn’t know better (and believe me, I don’t), I would almost wonder if this Jew working for Trump is purposefully attempting to sabotage his campaign.
And I am not asserting a conspiracy theory here. I am not suggesting some other Jew called up Cohen and told him he’d better serve the tribe and sabotage the Donald. The word “purposeful” wouldn’t even be explicitly accurate. The way Jewish psychology works, they subconsciously sense threats to their tribe, then act out based on these perceived threats.
Trump is keeping Jew Lawyer Michael Cohen close enough that he can repeatedly stab him in the back.
I am not one to believe that Trump must be controlled by Jews because he has a Jew lawyer working for him. I would assume this Jew is a very good lawyer, and Trump thought he would bring that skill set to the campaign. But he is into something much bigger now than suing people, and this Jew is obviously a liability, not an asset.
Hopefully, he’s learned something here, and will dump this Jew.
Over on CBS News, the Jew Rebecca Kaplan informs us that Cohen has apologized for threatening the Asian and saying that you can’t rape your wife.
Donald Trump’s lawyer apologized Tuesday for comments he made to a “Daily Beast” reporter saying, “You cannot rape your spouse.”
“Rarely am I surprised by the press, but the gall of this particular reporter to make such a reprehensible and false allegation against Mr. Trump truly stunned me. In my moment of shock and anger, I made an inarticulate comment – which I do not believe – and which I apologize for entirely,” Cohen said in a statement.
…
In an interview on “CBS This Morning” Tuesday, Mak said the situation “devolved pretty quickly.”
Mak said he was prompted to look into any rape charges against Trump after the presidential candidate described Mexican immigrants as criminals and rapists in his announcement speech.
He said that Trump should respond to the rape allegations.
“Trump should be held accountable for this allegation. He should be asked pretty directly what he thinks of it and how he would like to respond,” Mak said on “CBS This Morning.”
He added that since Michael Cohen has represented Trump in the media on past occasions, “it’s very obvious that Trump has had no problem with Michael Cohen, his special counsel, speaking on his behalf in the past.”
So he let a Jew speak on his behalf and the Jew said – on his behalf – “what I’m going to do to you is going to be fucking disgusting. You understand me?”
Lovely.
Trump, get rid of this Jew. Hire someone who will not sabotage you openly and then blame it on “a moment of shock.” The last thing you need is a Yiddish enemy-agent on your team. This is only the beginning of the troubles this rat will bring down on you.
Jeb Bush (also known as El Jebo/cuckservative) is finally opening up and speaking frankly about the feelings that The Donald (also known as the New Hitler/New Bane) made him feel.
Many can feel for him, especially if they are married to a Mexican troll and have ratlike criminal children.
“We are very Hispanic in the sense that we speak Spanish at home,” the former Florida governor said in a Spanish-language interview with Telemundo. “Columba is very Mexican. She is proud of her U.S. citizenship naturally, but we eat Mexican food at home. Our children are Hispanic in many aspects, and we don’t talk about that. But yes, the Hispanic influence in my family is something quite important in my life.”
Bush’s comments came in his first full Spanish-language interview on the 2016 presidential campaign trail. He sat down with Telemundo’s José Díaz-Balart for a wide-ranging discussion Tuesday that was previewed on the channel that evening, but will be aired in full on Sunday.
The interview comes as real estate mogul Donald Trump has soared to the lead in a number of national polls after attacking undocumented Mexican immigrants as “rapists” and criminals — remarks that many on both the left and the right have called offensive and wrong.
Yes, we are all staggered by both the left and right calling a factually accurate statement, applauded by the majority of Whites in this country, “offensive and wrong.”
But I’m sure Jeb was even more staggered hearing it, given that it exposes he himself as a collaborator with invading rapists.
Bush said of Trump’s remarks, “I was hurt, hearing someone speaking in such a vulgar fashion,” adding that the remarks “hurt millions of people that are here legally.”
I am so sorry, Jeb.
So, so sorry you felt hurt.
I can’t imagine what it feels like to feel that feeling.
Clearly, what America needs now is a President who is not afraid to admit when a Bane-like figure such as Trump hurts their feelings with words.
Noelle Bush, 2002 mugshotJohn Bush, 2005 mugshot
After all, Bush’s own son has been discriminated against for being a criminal Mexican.
The former Florida governor then went on to discuss discrimination targeted at Hispanics, mentioning “a time when my son went to Ocala,” a city in central Florida around 80 miles northwest of Orlando, “to play baseball, a game on a team. And the team was a Miami team. The majority were Hispanics. My son George, he’s dark-skinned. And they spoke horrible things about those from Miami.”
“[N]aturally, I had to explain or describe that people who hate are not the majority, and we must accept them and move forward,” Bush said.
Bush added that his son was “quite upset” because “in Miami, we don’t have a problem. But in other parts of the country it [discrimination] exists.”
“It’s a good lesson to learn, to always remember that we still don’t have a country that’s full justice for all,” Bush said. “We can see this in the African-American communities also. There’s discrimination still. And in my life, it’s important to acknowledge this, and to act about that. Yes.”
Good God, now he’s talking about racism against Blacks?
Jeb Bush has felt a lot of feelings, but there is one feeling he’s never felt: In charge.
This is almost too much. Does he not know that everyone is calling him a cuckservative? Why does he not try to do some damage control? Does he really think White Christians want the Mexican Obama for President?
If he doesn’t actually think that, then he is clearly trying to lose on purpose. Is that not violating some law?
Someone needs to look this up:
Is Jeb Bush violating some law by attempting to secure the Republican nomination with the intention of losing the election?
I don’t really see how that could be legal. It must qualify as some form of fraud.
Telemundo’s Balart finished Bush’s sentence by saying, “And act on it, but how?”
Bush responded by touting the diversity of judges and administrative employees he appointed and hired while governor. “I had the greatest diversity of any other governor, and [I will] always be aware of the diversity of the state of Florida as well as the country. It’s a virtue, it’s something positive. It should not divide us, but we should respect and embrace diversity so that we can have better results.”
“‘Cuckservative,’ you say? I’ll see your ‘illegal immigration is an act of love,’ and raise you ‘diversity is a virtue.'”
Bush flaunted the fact that he “won more Hispanic votes than Anglo votes” in his 2002 re-election campaign and said that a Republican can carry the Latino vote.
“It can be done,” Bush said. “It can be done, based on a more positive message that respects people. This can be changed.”
“It can be done. I can transfer the wealth of Whites to a foreign people.”
This is incredible.
The sheer nerve of this faggot.
We want to make America great again, Jeb – we don’t want to make it browner!
The Trump Train may have just completely derailed of its own apparent volition.
We have heard some very disturbing comments in his most recent interview with CNN.
He told Dana Bush:
“We have to bring great people into this country, okay? And I want to bring — I love the idea of immigration, but it’s got to be legal immigration. Now, a lot of these people are helping us, whether it’s the grapes, or whether it’s jobs, and sometimes it’s jobs, in all fairness, I love our country, but sometimes it’s jobs that a citizen of the United States doesn’t want to do. I mean, there are jobs that a lot of people don’t want to do. I want to move them out, and we’re going to move them back in, and let them be legal, but they have to be in here legally.…Otherwise, you don’t have a country. You don’t have a country, if people can just pour into the country illegally, you don’t have a country, but I would expedite the system.”
Donald, I…
He then said that he would give the Mexicans some form of legal status, but perhaps, “later down the line, who knows what’s going to happen…[citizenship is] something I would think about, but I would say right now no. I’m not open to it. I would say legal status.”
Trump then literally went on to talk about Obama’s DREAMERs
“We’re going to do something. I’ve been giving it so much thought, you know you have a — on a humanitarian basis, you have a lot of deep thought going into this, believe me. I actually have a big heart.…I mean, a lot of people don’t understand that, but the DREAMers, it’s a tough situation, we’re going to do something, and one of the things we’re going to do is expedite — when somebody’s terrific, we want them back here, but they have to be legally…They’re with their parents, it depends. But, look, it sounds cold, and it sounds hard. But, we have a country, our country’s going to hell. We have to have a system where people are legally in our country.”
But Donald, I… I thought… Oh. Nevermind.
He then said he would get them out:
“Politicians aren’t going to find them because they have no clue. We will find them, we will get them out. It’s feasible if you know how to manage. Politicians don’t know how to manage.”
So, there you have it.
I guess.
That sounds like a lot of confused gibberish to me.
We liked Donald Trump because he said “you have to go back” and “they’ll all be gone soon.” We are not interested in a plan to deport everyone and then bring them back in legally and then maybe give them citizenship.
I hope that Trump comes out and says “sorry, I got some bad pills from Limbaugh just before that interview. I really just want to deport everyone – forget the other statements.”
But alas, I fear it will not be so. I fear that he got big by being brash, then thought he would play politics to win over the rest of the voters, when in actuality all he has done is alienated the people who liked him.
Ah well. We knew the fun wouldn’t go on forever. And what the Trump candidacy did can’t be taken back. The immigration issue is now on the table, and perhaps even more importantly, people are now aware of the cuckold nature of the GOP.
And who knows – this might not be the end. Even though it feels completely like the end. There could well be a few more lols in store.
Personally, I have never had any respect for “Megyn” Kelly, because I think an adult – even a woman – should be able to spell their own first name correctly.
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said Friday night that Fox News Channel anchor Megyn Kelly “had blood coming out of her eyes” when she aggressively questioned him during Thursday’s presidential debate.
“She gets out and she starts asking me all sorts of ridiculous questions,” Trump said in a CNN interview. “You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever. In my opinion, she was off base.”
In Thursday’s debate, Kelly questioned Trump over his history of offensive statements about women.
Calling in to CNN for a 30-minute interview on Friday night with Don Lemon, Trump hurled insults at Kelly, calling her a “lightweight,” and bashed her co-moderators, Chris Wallace and Bret Baier, as well as other Fox talent.
“I just don’t respect her as a journalist,” Trump said of Kelly. “I have no respect for her. I don’t think she’s very good. I think she’s highly overrated.”
Also, at 44-years-old (does she even still have menstruations?) she should not be bleaching her hair blonde or posing for pictures like this:
Put away the bleach, put away the slut cam, spell your name the correct way and stopping shilling for the Jews and maybe someone will have respect for you, Megan. I won’t, but maybe someone will.
The last 24 hours have been very interesting with Cuckservatism, Inc. – National Review, FOX News, and now Red State – all openly ganging up on Donald Trump:
“I have tried to give a great deal of latitude to Donald Trump in his run for the Presidency.
He is not a professional politician and is known for being a blunt talker. He connects with so much of the anger in the Republican base and is not afraid to be outspoken on a lot of issues. But there are even lines blunt talkers and unprofessional politicians should not cross.
Decency is one of those lines.
As much as I do personally like Donald Trump, his comment about Megyn Kelly on CNN is a bridge too far for me.
In a CNN interview, Mr. Trump said of Megyn Kelly, “You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes. Blood coming out of her wherever.” …”
Kevin Williamson fired a shot across the bow earlier this evening with an article that defended political correctness. Trump pretty much declared war on FOX News when he appeared on CNN with Don Lemon this evening.
This could spiral out of control and tee up exactly the scenario we want: Trump is angered and runs as an independent, causes a fatal schism, and takes down the Republican Party.
Many more people realize what a fraud Fox News is thanks to the performance of these three traitors pictured above.
The biggest loser of last night’s Republican presidential debate was undoubtedly Fox News. Even though the debate scored enormous ratings with something like 24 million viewers, the method of questioning delivered by the Fox moderators has completely destroyed the network’s credibility.
Most of us already know the score with Fox News. They are a propaganda operation which promotes a very slanted pro-Jewish, pro-Israel, pro-Zionist world view. It is a fairly unbalanced promoter of disinformation. They only pretend to be pro-White and pro-America to fool White people into accepting these dumb wars for Jews. It is important to note however that there are many White conservatives who haven’t quite gotten that yet. The debate last night seems to have been unintentionally successful at making a large number of White conservatives see what a fraud Fox News really is.
I agree @megynkelly is a retarded slut, but she should at least learn to spell her own first name.
The bias was embarrassingly transparent. Nearly all of the questions the Fox moderators posed were gotcha type questions. Many of them had little if any substance. They were simply designed to make people look bad. Often times the questions they asked ran longer than the amount of time the candidate had to answer them.
Of particular note were the ridiculously slanted questions they posed to The Donald. Several of them were personal attacks masked as questions. Megyn Kelly’s ridiculous question which was framed to make Trump look as if he was engaged in some made up war on women, specifically sparked a great deal of social media backlash. If you take a look at Kelly’s FaceJew page, nearly 99% of the comments are negative. Many of the posters mentioned that they weren’t even Trump supporters but found the questions posed by her and the other Fox moderators to be ridiculous and inappropriate.
If that wasn’t bad enough you had the ridiculous Jew Frank Luntz with his obviously staged post-debate focus group of bought and paid for retards. Somebody seriously needs to take that creature and stuff him in a concentration camp. He has no business doing anything in media nor do other members of his awful tribe of swindlers and liars.
The bottom line is that Fox News has been totally exposed as a media operation for Jews and cuckservatives. They are no different than CNN, MSNBC or any of these other pro-Jew media operations. The big news here is that a much larger number of people now realize this thanks to last night’s debate.
Let me make that clear: the quote about “Mark Zuckerberg’s personal Senator, Marco Rubio” having a “bill to triple H-1Bs that would decimate women and minorities” is from Donald Trump’s position paper:
When politicians talk about “immigration reform” they mean: amnesty, cheap labor and open borders. The Schumer-Rubio immigration bill was nothing more than a giveaway to the corporate patrons who run both parties.
Real immigration reform puts the needs of working people first – not wealthy globetrotting donors. We are the only country in the world whose immigration system puts the needs of other nations ahead of our own. That must change. Here are the three core principles of real immigration reform:
1. A nation without borders is not a nation. There must be a wall across the southern border.
2. A nation without laws is not a nation. Laws passed in accordance with our Constitutional system of government must be enforced.
3. A nation that does not serve its own citizens is not a nation. Any immigration plan must improve jobs, wages and security for all Americans.[More]
There’s a lot more, and it’s all good stuff.
Here’s a reaction from Ben Domenech, who’s sort of a Republican, and also sort of Hispanic:
Trump plan will be popular. Represents perfectly GOP portion that believes not in freedom but in identity politics for white people.
No, current immigration law calls for rounding up illegals. (When Eisenhower did “Operation Wetback”, he didn’t have to pass any laws.) As for their families, Trump presumes they’ll take them with them.
However, who also shares his views are large numbers of Republican voters, and for that matter, a majority of Americans of all parties…as the policy wonks at Vox were rather shocked to find recently:
The "most popular position was … an outright moratorium on all immigration until the border is proven secure." http://t.co/SsI18jF3kw
Des Moines, Iowa — CNN reports that Donald Trump, the tower-dwelling urbanite from New York, has revealed that he is in fact Batman:
The Bowman family had driven from the western suburbs to see Trump and his helicopter. Neither David nor Sarah Bowman had resolved to vote for Trump, at least not yet, but they had four little boys, and this chance was too good to miss.
Into the helicopter went William, 9; Sean, 6; Brendan, 5; and Henry, who just turned 3. Their mother went with them. Henry got scared just before takeoff and left the aircraft to be with his father. The other boys remained. William brought a GoPro camera to capture the experience; a clip later wound up on Facebook.
“Mr. Trump,” he said, aiming the camera at his benefactor.
“Yes,” Trump said, pulling on the lapels of his jacket.
“Are you Batman?” the boy asked.
“I am Batman,” Trump said.
The helicopter roared to life, causing another windstorm, hurling more dust at the people outside. William looked out the window, marveling at the power of the machine.
Well, that settles it. Effective immediately, we have to stop baneposting about Donald Trump. He isn’t the villain that the media wants us to have. He’s the hero America deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So we’ll hunt him. Because he can take it. Because he’s not our hero. He’s a silent guardian, a watchful protector. A shitlord.
Now that Donald Trump has brought back the idea of building a fence, the left is again attacking the utility of a border fence. We know that fences work: just look at how well the fences worked in securing Israel from Palestinian terrorists and illegal aliens from Africa.
Constructing an impassable wall along the U.S.-Mexico border would be a tall order — even for master real estate developer and 2016 GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump.
“From a security standpoint, it really is not an intelligent solution,” said Eric Olson, associate director of the Latin American program at the non-partisan Wilson Center. In fact, “it’s ludicrous,” Olson said of the idea, which has become a hallmark of Trump’s campaign.
Experts estimate that building and maintaining such a wall on the 1,954-mile border, which snakes along four huge states, would cost tens of billions of dollars. And the 21,000 border patrol agents currently on duty would be “nowhere near sufficient” to keep close surveillance on all of it, said Wayne Cornelius, director of University of California San Diego’s Mexican migration field research program.
“Any kind of border barrier can be climbed over, and to prevent that type of activity, we would have to have not just drones in the sky, but a lot of boots on the ground,” he said.
Now, are these two “experts” engineers, law enforcement experts, or men with extensive military experience? No, Eric Olson [Email him] is a foreign affairs specialist with a Master’s Degree in International Affairs and a Bachelor’s Degree in History. Hardly the training for building anything, much less a fence like those the Israelis have successfully and apparently cheaply built.
Worse yet, Wayne Cornelius [Email him] is an immigration activist and tenured radical with a background in Political Science and Latin American Studies. No engineering, military, or law enforcement training, experience, or study.
The extent of their argument is the 12′ fence is overcome by 13′ ladder.
NOGALES, Sonora — The 31-year-old Oaxaca native was dangling by one arm, a drop of more than two stories below her.
Slowly, her hand slipped and her legs slammed the desert floor with a bone-rattling thud. She couldn’t move. All she could think about was the 14-year-old daughter she had left behind — whom she might never see again.
Reports of migrants getting hurt when trying to jump the fence or trekking through the treacherous desert are not new, but immigrant shelters and Mexican officials are seeing a spike of migrants — especially women — getting hurt trying to jump the border fence. They think, incorrectly, that the jump will be easier than making the treacherous trek through the 100-degree desert.
“It’s the same crossing through the wall or through the desert,” said Gilda Felix, director of the Juan Bosco immigrant shelter in Nogales, where many of the injured are brought before going home. “Both are difficult and dangerous.”
This year the Mexican Consulate in Tucson has seen more people needing medical attention after falling from the border fence than from crossing the desert, said Ricardo Pineda, the consul general. So far this year, there have been 37 cases of injured Mexican migrants. In all of 2014 Pineda’s office reported 56 cases. That includes all injuries, not just falling from the fence.
Furthermore (the lies from the left never end) they also think it can’t be built:
Many parts of the border are dotted with rugged terrains and streams, which would be nearly impossible to build on. In other areas, there are protected wildlife refuges and Indian territory. And elsewhere, ranchers would have to agree to sell their land to the federal government — which is unlikely to happen, even as disgruntled as they may be that migrants are using their property as a border crossing area.
“It’s private land,” Cornelius said. “Trump can’t just go in and build his wall.”
First, most of the Mexican border is flat and featureless, perfect ground for building a fence. There are only a few areas of California that are mountainous. Arizona and New Mexico have even fewer mountainous areas, and Texas only a few hills on the border. In any event, fences would channel the flow of illegal immigration to those more difficult areas, discouraging illegal immigration and making enforcement easier. It would not be long before illegal aliens would get discouraged.
The real secret to the border fence is interior enforcement, which is why the problem with illegal immigration is increasing, due to the collapse of interior enforcement, current and planned. And as for Cornelius’s “it’s private land”, has he never heard of eminent domain?
It is nonsense to say that an Amendment to the Constitution could be unconstitutional. The writer is saying that any plan that “squarely targets Latinos” is unconstitutional under “disparate impact theory”, as found by the Supreme Court in the 14th Amendment. [Sorry, Republicans: Ending Birthright Citizenship Would Be Unconstitutional| The very amendment that conservatives want to “fix” stands as a shield against government-sanctioned discrimination, By Cristian Farias, Legal Affairs Writer, The Huffington Post, August 19, 2015]
The theory is briefly:
The law “targets” Hispanics (because they’re the majority of the invaders).
Mexican and South American Hispanics are “minorities”, because of being partly Indian. (I believe the writer himself is a white Chilean, but I could be wrong.)
Minorities are sacred, under the 14th Amendment,
So ending “birthright” citizenship would be unconstitutional.
But we’re talking about amending (unnecessarily) the 14th Amendment itself. Would be unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment to repeal the 14th Amendment entirely?
No one is proposing that, but you know, the Civil War has been over for some time, so it’s probably no longer necessary, and it’s led the Supreme Court into some weird and strange jurisprudence, notably that “disparate impact” thing.
But there’s a different question, not involving constitutional scholarship, but rather power politics.
Would the Supreme Court find such an Amendment unconstitutional? Answer: who knows? The Supreme Court might find anything. That’s why we keep talking about impeaching judges.
